Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Initial support for SPDM Responders

[Klaus Jensen]

On Feb 15 14:44, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:44:00 +1000
> Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Just wanted to add that back in v2 Klaus Jensen stated:
> 
> "I have no problem with picking this up for nvme, but I'd rather not take
>  the full series through my tree without reviews/acks from the pci
>  maintainers."
> 
> So I'd like to add my request that Michael and/or Marcell takes a look
> when they have time.
> 
> I've been carrying more or less the first 2 patches in my CXL staging
> tree for a couple of years (the initial Linux Kernel support that Lukas
> Wunner is now handling was developed against this) and I would love
> to see this upstream. Along with PCI and CXL and NVME usecases this
> is a major part of the Confidential Compute device assignment story
> via PCI/TDISP and CXL equivalent.
> 
> It's not changed in significant ways since v2 back in October last year.
> 

Would someone be willing to sign up to maintain the spdm_socket backend?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature