qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 33/47] hw/m68k/q800: use qemu_find_nic_info()


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 33/47] hw/m68k/q800: use qemu_find_nic_info()
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 16:13:01 +0000

On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 16:07, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 11:30 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 31/01/2024 15.18, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 13:18 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > Don't we have to change nd->macaddr.a[0 to 2] with this hard-coded
> > > > MAC-prefix, too?
> > >
> > > I don't think so.
> > >
> > > We either get the MAC address from 'nd' if that exists, or generate a
> > > new MAC address with qemu_macaddr_default_if_unset().
> > >
> > > Then we override the OUI in the actual device. We don't care about 'nd'
> > > any more at that point.
> >
> > I just double-checked, and yes, you're right, so:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
> Thank you, just just about completes my set. Every patch now has a
> Reviewed-by: except two of them (hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw and
> hw/arm/aspeed) which only have an Acked-by:
>
> I think according to The Rules I just need a maintainer to *tell* me to
> send a pull request and then I'm allowed to do so?

Yeah, go ahead and send a pullreq for this.

(I have a new board model brewing so it would be handy for me
to have the new functions upstream so I can create the ethernet
device in the right way :-))

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]