Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] rutabaga_gfx + gfxstream

[Alyssa Ross]

Hi Gurchetan,

> Thanks for the reminder.  I did make a request to create the release
> tags, but changes were requested by Fedora packaging effort:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242058
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241701
>
> So the request was canceled, but never re-requested.  I'll fire off
> another request, with:
>
> gfxstream: 23d05703b94035ac045df60823fb1fc4be0fdf1c ("gfxstream:
> manually add debug logic")
> AEMU: dd8b929c247ce9872c775e0e5ddc4300011d0e82 ("aemu: improve licensing")
>
> as the commits.  These match the Fedora requests, and the AEMU one has
> been merged into Fedora already it seems.

These revisions have the problem I mentioned in my previous message:

>> The gfxstream ref mentioned here isn't compatible with
>> v0.1.2-rutabaga-release, because it no longer provides logging_base.pc,

rutabaga was not fixed to use the new AEMU package names until after the
v0.1.2-rutabaga-release tag, in commit 5dfd74a06.  So will there be a
new Rutabaga release that's compatible with these release versions of
gfxstream and AEMU?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature