qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] reset: Allow multiple stages of system resets


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] reset: Allow multiple stages of system resets
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:58:45 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 1/17/24 11:28, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 1/17/24 10:15, peterx@redhat.com wrote:
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

QEMU resets do not have a way to order reset hooks.  Add one coarse grained
reset stage so that some devices can be reset later than some others.
I would precise that the lowest stage has the highest priority and is
handled first.

yes. May be add an enum like we have for migration :

typedef enum {
    MIG_PRI_DEFAULT = 0,
    MIG_PRI_IOMMU,              /* Must happen before PCI devices */
    MIG_PRI_PCI_BUS,            /* Must happen before IOMMU */
    MIG_PRI_VIRTIO_MEM,         /* Must happen before IOMMU */
    MIG_PRI_GICV3_ITS,          /* Must happen before PCI devices */
    MIG_PRI_GICV3,              /* Must happen before the ITS */
    MIG_PRI_MAX,
} MigrationPriority;

I think it would help understand the reset ordering and maintenance
when grepping qemu_register_reset_one().

Thanks,

C.




Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
  include/sysemu/reset.h |  5 ++++
  hw/core/reset.c        | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/sysemu/reset.h b/include/sysemu/reset.h
index 609e4d50c2..0de697ce9f 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/reset.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/reset.h
@@ -5,9 +5,14 @@
typedef void QEMUResetHandler(void *opaque); +#define QEMU_RESET_STAGES_N 2
+
  void qemu_register_reset(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque);
+void qemu_register_reset_one(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque,
+                             bool skip_snap, int stage);
  void qemu_register_reset_nosnapshotload(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque);
  void qemu_unregister_reset(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque);
+void qemu_unregister_reset_one(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque, int 
stage);
  void qemu_devices_reset(ShutdownCause reason);
#endif
diff --git a/hw/core/reset.c b/hw/core/reset.c
index 8cf60b2b09..a84c9bee84 100644
--- a/hw/core/reset.c
+++ b/hw/core/reset.c
@@ -36,55 +36,83 @@ typedef struct QEMUResetEntry {
      bool skip_on_snapshot_load;
  } QEMUResetEntry;
-static QTAILQ_HEAD(, QEMUResetEntry) reset_handlers =
-    QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(reset_handlers);
+typedef QTAILQ_HEAD(QEMUResetList, QEMUResetEntry) QEMUResetList;
+static QEMUResetList reset_handlers[QEMU_RESET_STAGES_N];
-static void qemu_register_reset_one(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque,
-                                    bool skip_snap)
+static void __attribute__((__constructor__)) qemu_reset_handlers_init(void)
+{
+    QEMUResetList *head;
+    int i = 0;
nit: you may put the declarations within the block
+
+    for (i = 0; i < QEMU_RESET_STAGES_N; i++) {
+        head = &reset_handlers[i];
+        QTAILQ_INIT(head);
+    }
+}
+
+void qemu_register_reset_one(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque,
+                             bool skip_snap, int stage)
  {
      QEMUResetEntry *re = g_new0(QEMUResetEntry, 1);
+    QEMUResetList *head;
+
+    assert(stage >= 0 && stage < QEMU_RESET_STAGES_N);
+    head = &reset_handlers[stage];
re->func = func;
      re->opaque = opaque;
      re->skip_on_snapshot_load = skip_snap;
-    QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&reset_handlers, re, entry);
+    QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(head, re, entry);
  }
void qemu_register_reset(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque)
  {
-    /* By default, do not skip during load of a snapshot */
Shouldn't the above comment stay since the statement is not affected by
this patch? Or remove it in previous patch?
-    qemu_register_reset_one(func, opaque, false);
+    qemu_register_reset_one(func, opaque, false, 0);
  }
void qemu_register_reset_nosnapshotload(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque)
  {
-    qemu_register_reset_one(func, opaque, true);
+    qemu_register_reset_one(func, opaque, true, 0);
  }
-void qemu_unregister_reset(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque)
+void qemu_unregister_reset_one(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque, int stage)
  {
+    QEMUResetList *head;
      QEMUResetEntry *re;
- QTAILQ_FOREACH(re, &reset_handlers, entry) {
+    assert(stage >= 0 && stage < QEMU_RESET_STAGES_N);
+    head = &reset_handlers[stage];
+
+    QTAILQ_FOREACH(re, head, entry) {
          if (re->func == func && re->opaque == opaque) {
-            QTAILQ_REMOVE(&reset_handlers, re, entry);
+            QTAILQ_REMOVE(head, re, entry);
              g_free(re);
              return;
          }
      }
  }
+void qemu_unregister_reset(QEMUResetHandler *func, void *opaque)
+{
+    qemu_unregister_reset_one(func, opaque, 0);
+}
+
  void qemu_devices_reset(ShutdownCause reason)
  {
      QEMUResetEntry *re, *nre;
+    QEMUResetList *head;
+    int stage;
/* reset all devices */
-    QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(re, &reset_handlers, entry, nre) {
-        if (reason == SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SNAPSHOT_LOAD &&
-            re->skip_on_snapshot_load) {
-            continue;
+    for (stage = 0; stage < QEMU_RESET_STAGES_N; stage++) {
+        head = &reset_handlers[stage];
+        QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(re, head, entry, nre) {
+            if (reason == SHUTDOWN_CAUSE_SNAPSHOT_LOAD &&
+                re->skip_on_snapshot_load) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            re->func(re->opaque);
          }
-        re->func(re->opaque);
      }
  }
Thanks

Eric






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]