Re: [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation

[Alex Bennée]

Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:

> Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 1:43 AM Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> writes:
>>>
>>> > From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>>> >
>>> > It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for
>>> > error. In fact, the validation is even more complex.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>>> > Acked-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
>>> > Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
>>> > Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-2-a760156a337f@daynix.com>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> ping: along with this are the RiscV maintainers happy for me to take:
>>>
>>>   [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation
>>>   [PATCH v2 24/43] target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class
>>>   [PATCH v2 25/43] target/riscv: Validate misa_mxl_max only once
>>>
>>> through my next pull request?
>>
>> Yep! Go for it
>
> Sadly some of the recent changes that went through have created a merge
> conflict.
>
> Akihiko,
>
> Any chance you could re-spin just the MISA_MXL patches?

Never mind, I think I got it figured out.

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro