qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FW: [PATCH] vhost-user: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICAT


From: Wentao Jia
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH] vhost-user: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:18:07 +0000

Hi, Michael and Jason

Do you have any other comments? 
Is there a schedule for merge the patch into the community?
Thank you 

Wentao

-----Original Message-----
From: Wentao Jia 
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 1:57 PM
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: 'mst@redhat.com' <mst@redhat.com>; Rick Zhong 
<zhaoyong.zhong@nephogine.com>; 'Jason Wang' <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH] vhost-user: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and 
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature


---
 hw/net/vhost_net.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c index 
e8e1661646..211ca859a6 100644
--- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
+++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static const int user_feature_bits[] = {
     VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM,
     VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED,
     VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET,
+    VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER,
+    VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA,
     VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS,
     VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT,
     VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_USO4,
--

-----Original Message-----
From: Wentao Jia
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 1:38 PM
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com; Rick Zhong <zhaoyong.zhong@nephogine.com>
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH] vhost-user: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and 
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature

Hi, Jason

It is good just change feature bits, I will commit a new patch, thanks

Wentao Jia

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 11:24 AM
To: Wentao Jia <wentao.jia@nephogine.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com; Rick Zhong <zhaoyong.zhong@nephogine.com>
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH] vhost-user: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and 
VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 10:26 AM Wentao Jia <wentao.jia@nephogine.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Michael  and Jason
>
>
>
> please review the patch at your convenience, thank you
>
> vhost-user: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA 
> feature - Patchwork (kernel.org)
>
>
>
> Wentao Jia
>
>
>
> From: Wentao Jia
> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 6:11 PM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] vhost-user: add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and 
> VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
>
>
>
> VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER and VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature are important 
> feature
>
> for dpdk vdpa packets transmitting performance, add the 2 features at 
> vhost-user
>
> front-end to negotiation with backend.
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Xu zhenbing.xu@corigine.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Jia wentao.jia@corigine.com
>
> Reviewed-by:   Xinying Yu xinying.yu@corigine.com
>
> Reviewed-by:   Shujing Dong shujing.dong@corigine.com
>
> Reviewed-by:   Rick Zhong zhaoyong.zhong@corigine.com
>
> ---
>
> hw/net/vhost_net.c         | 2 ++
>
> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 4 ++++
>
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
>
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
>
> index e8e1661646..211ca859a6 100644
>
> --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
>
> +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
>
> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static const int user_feature_bits[] = {
>
>      VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM,
>
>      VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED,
>
>      VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET,
>
> +    VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER,
>
> +    VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA,
>
>      VIRTIO_NET_F_RSS,
>
>      VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT,
>
>      VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_USO4,
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
>
> index c8f72850bc..3880b6764c 100644
>
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
>
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
>
> @@ -369,6 +369,10 @@ typedef struct VirtIORNGConf VirtIORNGConf;
>
>                        VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED, false), \
>
>      DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("queue_reset", _state, _field, \
>
>                        VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET, true)
>
> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("notification_data", _state, _field, \
>
> +                      VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA, true), \
>
> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("in_order", _state, _field, \
>
> +                      VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER, true)

Do we want compatibility support for those?

Thanks

>
>
>
> hwaddr virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
>
> bool virtio_queue_enabled_legacy(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
>
> --


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]