[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] hw/virtio: derive vhost-user-gpio from vhost-user-bas
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] hw/virtio: derive vhost-user-gpio from vhost-user-base |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Nov 2023 17:30:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.11.24; emacs 29.1 |
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:56:07AM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Now the new base class supports config handling we can take advantage
>> and make vhost-user-gpio a much simpler boilerplate wrapper. Also as
>> this doesn't require any target specific hacks we only need to build
>> the stubs once.
>>
>> Message-Id: <20230418162140.373219-12-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Acked-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Message-Id: <20231009095937.195728-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> - case CHR_EVENT_OPENED:
>> - if (vu_gpio_connect(dev, &local_err) < 0) {
>> - qemu_chr_fe_disconnect(&gpio->chardev);
>> - return;
>> - }
>> - break;
>> - case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
>> - /* defer close until later to avoid circular close */
>> - vhost_user_async_close(dev, &gpio->chardev, &gpio->vhost_dev,
>> - vu_gpio_disconnect);
>
> Hmm. Looking at this, it seems that the base device will handle close
> synchronously. No? Why isn't this a problem?
I suspect it was a copy and paste from another vhost-user impl. But
testing has shown it works ok.
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro