qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] hw/fsi: Added qtest


From: Ninad Palsule
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] hw/fsi: Added qtest
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:25:15 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

Hello Thomas,

On 10/23/23 01:51, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 21/10/2023 23.17, Ninad Palsule wrote:
Added basic qtests for FSI model.

Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
---
v3:
  - Added new qtest as per Cedric's comment.
V4:
  - Remove MAINTAINER and documentation changes from this commit
v6:
  - Incorporated review comments by Thomas Huth.
---
  tests/qtest/fsi-test.c  | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  tests/qtest/meson.build |   1 +
  2 files changed, 208 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tests/qtest/fsi-test.c

diff --git a/tests/qtest/fsi-test.c b/tests/qtest/fsi-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..01a0739092
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/qtest/fsi-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+/*
+ * QTest testcases for IBM's Flexible Service Interface (FSI)
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 IBM Corporation
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *   Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
+ * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
+ */
+
+#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include <glib/gstdio.h>
+
+#include "qemu/module.h"
+#include "libqtest-single.h"
+
+/* Registers from ast2600 specifications */
+#define ASPEED_FSI_ENGINER_TRIGGER   0x04
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_BUS_SELECT   0x10
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_BUS_SELECT   0x28
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_RW_DIRECTION 0x14
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_RW_DIRECTION 0x2c
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_XFER_SIZE    0x18
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_XFER_SIZE    0x30
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_BUS_ADDR     0x1c
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_BUS_ADDR     0x34
+#define ASPEED_FSI_INTRRUPT_CLEAR    0x40
+#define ASPEED_FSI_INTRRUPT_STATUS   0x48
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_BUS_STATUS   0x80
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_BUS_STATUS   0x8c
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_READ_DATA    0x84
+#define ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_READ_DATA    0x90
+
+/*
+ * FSI Base addresses from the ast2600 specifications.
+ */
+#define AST2600_OPB_FSI0_BASE_ADDR 0x1e79b000
+#define AST2600_OPB_FSI1_BASE_ADDR 0x1e79b100
+
+static uint32_t aspeed_fsi_base_addr;
+
+static uint32_t aspeed_fsi_readl(QTestState *s, uint32_t reg)
+{
+    return qtest_readl(s, aspeed_fsi_base_addr + reg);
+}
+
+static void aspeed_fsi_writel(QTestState *s, uint32_t reg, uint32_t val)
+{
+    qtest_writel(s, aspeed_fsi_base_addr + reg, val);
+}
+
+/* Setup base address and select register */
+static void test_fsi_setup(QTestState *s, uint32_t base_addr)
+{
+    uint32_t curval;
+
+    /* Set the base select register */
+    if (base_addr == AST2600_OPB_FSI0_BASE_ADDR) {
+        aspeed_fsi_base_addr = base_addr;
+
+        /* Unselect FSI1 */
+        aspeed_fsi_writel(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_BUS_SELECT, 0x0);
+        curval = aspeed_fsi_readl(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_BUS_SELECT);
+        g_assert_cmpuint(curval, ==, 0x0);
+
+        /* Select FSI0 */
+        aspeed_fsi_writel(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_BUS_SELECT, 0x1);
+        curval = aspeed_fsi_readl(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_BUS_SELECT);
+        g_assert_cmpuint(curval, ==, 0x1);
+    } else if (base_addr == AST2600_OPB_FSI1_BASE_ADDR) {
+        aspeed_fsi_base_addr = base_addr;

You could move "aspeed_fsi_base_addr = base_addr" before the if-statement, so that you don't have to repeat it in both cases.

Fixed it. I will update it in version 7.

Thanks for the review.

Regards,

Ninad


+        /* Unselect FSI0 */
+        aspeed_fsi_writel(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_BUS_SELECT, 0x0);
+        curval = aspeed_fsi_readl(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB0_BUS_SELECT);
+        g_assert_cmpuint(curval, ==, 0x0);
+
+        /* Select FSI1 */
+        aspeed_fsi_writel(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_BUS_SELECT, 0x1);
+        curval = aspeed_fsi_readl(s, ASPEED_FSI_OPB1_BUS_SELECT);
+        g_assert_cmpuint(curval, ==, 0x1);
+    } else {
+        g_assert_not_reached();
+    }
+}

Anyway:
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]