qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH V2 08/10] physmem: Add helper function to destroy CPU AddressSpac


From: Salil Mehta
Subject: [PATCH V2 08/10] physmem: Add helper function to destroy CPU AddressSpace
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 01:19:31 +0100

Virtual CPU Hot-unplug leads to unrealization of a CPU object. This also
involves destruction of the CPU AddressSpace. Add common function to help
destroy the CPU AddressSpace.

Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
---
 include/exec/cpu-common.h |  8 ++++++++
 include/hw/core/cpu.h     |  1 +
 softmmu/physmem.c         | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
index 41788c0bdd..eb56a228a2 100644
--- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h
+++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h
@@ -120,6 +120,14 @@ size_t qemu_ram_pagesize_largest(void);
  */
 void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
                             const char *prefix, MemoryRegion *mr);
+/**
+ * cpu_address_space_destroy:
+ * @cpu: CPU for which address space needs to be destroyed
+ * @asidx: integer index of this address space
+ *
+ * Note that with KVM only one address space is supported.
+ */
+void cpu_address_space_destroy(CPUState *cpu, int asidx);
 
 void cpu_physical_memory_rw(hwaddr addr, void *buf,
                             hwaddr len, bool is_write);
diff --git a/include/hw/core/cpu.h b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
index 648b5b3586..65d2ae4581 100644
--- a/include/hw/core/cpu.h
+++ b/include/hw/core/cpu.h
@@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ struct CPUState {
     QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, qemu_work_item) work_list;
 
     CPUAddressSpace *cpu_ases;
+    int cpu_ases_count;
     int num_ases;
     AddressSpace *as;
     MemoryRegion *memory;
diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
index 4f6ca653b3..4dfa0ca66f 100644
--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
+++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
@@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
 
     if (!cpu->cpu_ases) {
         cpu->cpu_ases = g_new0(CPUAddressSpace, cpu->num_ases);
+        cpu->cpu_ases_count = cpu->num_ases;
     }
 
     newas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
@@ -774,6 +775,30 @@ void cpu_address_space_init(CPUState *cpu, int asidx,
     }
 }
 
+void cpu_address_space_destroy(CPUState *cpu, int asidx)
+{
+    CPUAddressSpace *cpuas;
+
+    assert(asidx < cpu->num_ases);
+    assert(asidx == 0 || !kvm_enabled());
+    assert(cpu->cpu_ases);
+
+    cpuas = &cpu->cpu_ases[asidx];
+    if (tcg_enabled()) {
+        memory_listener_unregister(&cpuas->tcg_as_listener);
+    }
+
+    address_space_destroy(cpuas->as);
+    g_free_rcu(cpuas->as, rcu);
+
+    if (cpu->cpu_ases_count == 1) {
+        g_free(cpu->cpu_ases);
+        cpu->cpu_ases = NULL;
+    }
+
+    cpu->cpu_ases_count--;
+}
+
 AddressSpace *cpu_get_address_space(CPUState *cpu, int asidx)
 {
     /* Return the AddressSpace corresponding to the specified index */
-- 
2.34.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]