[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Fixes for zero_bss
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] linux-user: Fixes for zero_bss |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2023 22:49:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 |
On 30/8/23 22:34, Richard Henderson wrote:
The previous change, 2d385be6152, assumed !PAGE_VALID meant that
the page would be unmapped by the elf image. However, since we
reserved the entire image space via mmap, PAGE_VALID will always
be set. Instead, assume PROT_NONE for the same condition.
Furthermore, assume bss is only ever present for writable segments,
and that there is no page overlap between PT_LOAD segments.
Instead of an assert, return false to indicate failure.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1854
Fixes: 2d385be6152 ("linux-user: Do not adjust zero_bss for host page size")
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
linux-user/elfload.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/elfload.c b/linux-user/elfload.c
index a5b28fa3e7..7bc7bcec19 100644
--- a/linux-user/elfload.c
+++ b/linux-user/elfload.c
@@ -2308,21 +2308,40 @@ static bool zero_bss(abi_ulong start_bss, abi_ulong
end_bss, int prot)
{
abi_ulong align_bss;
+ /* We only expect writable bss; the code segment shouldn't need this. */
+ if (!(prot & PROT_WRITE)) {
+ return false;
Caller will fail with random errno and "Error mapping file".
Not really accurate. Maybe we could pass an Error* paramenter
to zero_bss().
+ }
+
align_bss = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(start_bss);
end_bss = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(end_bss);
if (start_bss < align_bss) {
int flags = page_get_flags(start_bss);
- if (!(flags & PAGE_VALID)) {
- /* Map the start of the bss. */
+ if (!(flags & PAGE_BITS)) {
+ /*
+ * The whole address space of the executable was reserved
+ * at the start, therefore all pages will be VALID.
+ * But assuming there are no PROT_NONE PT_LOAD segments,
+ * a PROT_NONE page means no data all bss, and we can
+ * simply extend the new anon mapping back to the start
+ * of the page of bss.
+ */
align_bss -= TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
- } else if (flags & PAGE_WRITE) {
- /* The page is already mapped writable. */
- memset(g2h_untagged(start_bss), 0, align_bss - start_bss);
} else {
- /* Read-only zeros? */
- g_assert_not_reached();
+ /*
+ * The start of the bss shares a page with something.
+ * The only thing that we expect is the data section,
+ * which would already be marked writable.
+ * Overlapping the RX code segment seems malformed.
+ */
+ if (!(flags & PAGE_WRITE)) {
Similar random errno and "Error mapping file".
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* The page is already mapped and writable. */
+ memset(g2h_untagged(start_bss), 0, align_bss - start_bss);
}
}