[Stable-8.0.4 48/63] hw/xen: fix off-by-one in xen_evtchn_set_gsi()

[Michael Tokarev]

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>

Coverity points out (CID 1508128) a bounds checking error. We need to check
for gsi >= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS, not just greater-than.

Also fix up an assert() that has the same problem, that Coverity didn't see.

Fixes: 4f81baa33ed6 ("hw/xen: Support GSI mapping to PIRQ")
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230801175747.145906-2-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
(cherry picked from commit cf885b19579646d6a085470658bc83432d6786d2)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c b/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c
index 3048329474..8c86c91a9e 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/xen_evtchn.c
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ static int allocate_pirq(XenEvtchnState *s, int type, int 
gsi)
  found:
     pirq_inuse_word(s, pirq) |= pirq_inuse_bit(pirq);
     if (gsi >= 0) {
-        assert(gsi <= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
+        assert(gsi < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS);
         s->gsi_pirq[gsi] = pirq;
     }
     s->pirq[pirq].gsi = gsi;
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ bool xen_evtchn_set_gsi(int gsi, int level)
 
     assert(qemu_mutex_iothread_locked());
 
-    if (!s || gsi < 0 || gsi > IOAPIC_NUM_PINS) {
+    if (!s || gsi < 0 || gsi >= IOAPIC_NUM_PINS) {
         return false;
     }
 
-- 
2.39.2