[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: missing boot rom: is it really a fatal error?
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: missing boot rom: is it really a fatal error? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2023 13:46:05 -0400 |
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:02:43AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 5:48 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:42:04PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > 08.05.2023 13:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 08:56:23PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > ..
> >
> > > > I'm about to revert that old change on debian, to make it just a
> warning instead
> > > > of an error (the code is different now, but the same principle
> applies), - because
> > > > I dislike dependencies which are useless 99.9% of the time and are
> trivial to
> > > > install when actually needed.
> > ..
> > > I advise against it.
> > > If you boot guest on a system with boot rom not installed you will not
> > > be able to migrate to a system with boot rom installed.
> > > why not? because we don't know how big to make the rom BAR.
> > > And users will not discover until much much later after they have
> > > painted themselves into a corner.
> >
> > Yes, I know about the migration. Actually there's an old bug report open
> > against debian qemu package, - the context is similar to the old bios128
> > vs bios256 thing in qemu upstream, - boot roms might change in size too.
> >
> > In this context though, the talk is not about migration at all. The
> missing
> > dep is in Xen HVM qemu package, a xen-only build of qemu-system-i386.
> And
> > this one fails to start unless the boot roms are provided. It is not
> even
> > capable of migration to begin with :)
> >
> > Thank you for the reminder, - very useful.
> >
> > /mjt
>
> I guess we decided we'd rather not handle reports from users about net
> boot not working. It's true most users don't need net boot but then
> that's true for most qemu functionality - 99% of users
> probably need 1% of the functionality. It's just a different 1% for each
> user...
>
>
> Yea, but to every user, their 1% is the most important thing ever...
> Or so it seems some days :)
>
> Warner
Yep. So I do not think we will be reverting this change in QEMU.
--
MST