[PULL 2/9] linux-user: report ENOTTY for unknown ioctls

[Laurent Vivier]

From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@t-8ch.de>

The correct error number for unknown ioctls is ENOTTY.

ENOSYS would mean that the ioctl() syscall itself is not implemented,
which is very improbable and unexpected for userspace.

ENOTTY means "Inappropriate ioctl for device". This is what the kernel
returns on unknown ioctls, what qemu is trying to express and what
userspace is prepared to handle.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@t-8ch.de>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230426070659.80649-1-thomas@t-8ch.de>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
---
 linux-user/syscall.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index 085ce530213e..954ed14df4c0 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -5747,7 +5747,7 @@ static abi_long do_ioctl(int fd, int cmd, abi_long arg)
         if (ie->target_cmd == 0) {
             qemu_log_mask(
                 LOG_UNIMP, "Unsupported ioctl: cmd=0x%04lx\n", (long)cmd);
-            return -TARGET_ENOSYS;
+            return -TARGET_ENOTTY;
         }
         if (ie->target_cmd == cmd)
             break;
@@ -5759,7 +5759,7 @@ static abi_long do_ioctl(int fd, int cmd, abi_long arg)
     } else if (!ie->host_cmd) {
         /* Some architectures define BSD ioctls in their headers
            that are not implemented in Linux.  */
-        return -TARGET_ENOSYS;
+        return -TARGET_ENOTTY;
     }
 
     switch(arg_type[0]) {
@@ -5817,7 +5817,7 @@ static abi_long do_ioctl(int fd, int cmd, abi_long arg)
         qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,
                       "Unsupported ioctl type: cmd=0x%04lx type=%d\n",
                       (long)cmd, arg_type[0]);
-        ret = -TARGET_ENOSYS;
+        ret = -TARGET_ENOTTY;
         break;
     }
     return ret;
-- 
2.40.1