[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag wi
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA |
Date: |
Thu, 4 May 2023 18:05:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) |
In $SUBJECT s/recive/receive/
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 01:44:42PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> This could only happen if the source send
s/send/sent/
> RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK (i.e. rdma) and destination don't have CONFIG_RDMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> ---
> migration/qemu-file.c | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- [PATCH 0/5] Migration RDMA cleanup, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 1/5] migration: Make RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK a normal case entry, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 3/5] migration/rdma: We can calculate the rioc from the QEMUFile, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 2/5] migration/rdma: simplify ram_control_load_hook(), Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 5/5] migration/rdma: Check for postcopy sooner, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04