qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 0/5] tcg patch queue


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PULL 0/5] tcg patch queue
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:49:47 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.9.15; emacs 29.0.60

Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:

> On 20/01/2023 11.53, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>> On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 10:41 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 16/01/2023 23.36, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> fb7e7990342e59cf67dbd895c1a1e3fb1741df7a:
>>>>
>>>>     tests/qtest/qom-test: Do not print tested properties by default
>>>> (2023-01-16 15:00:57 +0000)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>     https://gitlab.com/rth7680/qemu.git tags/pull-tcg-20230116
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to
>>>> 61710a7e23a63546da0071ea32adb96476fa5d07:
>>>>
>>>>     accel/tcg: Split out cpu_exec_{setjmp,loop} (2023-01-16 10:14:12
>>>> -1000)
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> - Reorg cpu_tb_exec around setjmp.
>>>> - Use __attribute__((target)) for buffer_is_zero.
>>>> - Add perfmap and jitdump for perf support.
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Ilya Leoshkevich (3):
>>>>         linux-user: Clean up when exiting due to a signal
>>>>         accel/tcg: Add debuginfo support
>>>>         tcg: add perfmap and jitdump
>>>>
>>>> Richard Henderson (2):
>>>>         util/bufferiszero: Use __attribute__((target)) for
>>>> avx2/avx512
>>>>         accel/tcg: Split out cpu_exec_{setjmp,loop}
>>>
>>>    Hi Richard, hi Ilya,
>>>
>>> with the recent QEMU master branch (commit 701ed34), I'm now seeing
>>> failures
>>> in Travis:
>>>
>>>    https://app.travis-ci.com/github/huth/qemu/jobs/593786529#L14411
>>>
>>> Everything was still fine a couple of days ago (commit fb7e799):
>>>
>>>    https://app.travis-ci.com/github/huth/qemu/builds/259755664
>>>
>>> ... so it seems this is likely related to this pull request. Could
>>> you
>>> please have a look?
>>>
>>>    Thanks,
>>>     Thomas
>>>
>> I would expect this to be (temporarily) fixed by [1], but we
>> probably
>> don't set GITLAB_CI in Travis. Would it make sense to set it? It looks
>> as if this variable is currently used only to skip certain tests.
>> If not, then maybe split it into QEMU_CI, GITLAB_CI and TRAVIS_CI?
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-01/msg04438.html
>
> Ah, ok, so this test has issues in gitlab, too!

*sigh* yeah the test is flaky but this is a subtly different failure
 mode. All the gitlab failures I saw where the test triggering the abort
 rather than the assert catch we have here.


>
> For Travis, I think we should either check the CI or TRAVIS
> environment variables:
>
>
> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/environment-variables/#default-environment-variables
>
>  Thomas


-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]