qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:08:17 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.9.2; emacs 28.2.50

Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:03:49PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> 
>> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 04:56:12PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > This new KVM exit allows userspace to handle memory-related errors. It
>> >> > indicates an error happens in KVM at guest memory range [gpa, gpa+size).
>> >> > The flags includes additional information for userspace to handle the
>> >> > error. Currently bit 0 is defined as 'private memory' where '1'
>> >> > indicates error happens due to private memory access and '0' indicates
>> >> > error happens due to shared memory access.
>> >> >
>> >> > When private memory is enabled, this new exit will be used for KVM to
>> >> > exit to userspace for shared <-> private memory conversion in memory
>> >> > encryption usage. In such usage, typically there are two kind of memory
>> >> > conversions:
>> >> >   - explicit conversion: happens when guest explicitly calls into KVM
>> >> >     to map a range (as private or shared), KVM then exits to userspace
>> >> >     to perform the map/unmap operations.
>> >> >   - implicit conversion: happens in KVM page fault handler where KVM
>> >> >     exits to userspace for an implicit conversion when the page is in a
>> >> >     different state than requested (private or shared).
>> >> >
>> >> > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>> >> > Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h       |  9 +++++++++
>> >> >  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst 
>> >> > b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> >> > index f3fa75649a78..975688912b8c 100644
>> >> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> >> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> >> > @@ -6537,6 +6537,29 @@ array field represents return values. The 
>> >> > userspace should update the return
>> >> >  values of SBI call before resuming the VCPU. For more details on 
>> >> > RISC-V SBI
>> >> >  spec refer, https://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc.
>> >> >  
>> >> > +::
>> >> > +
>> >> > +               /* KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT */
>> >> > +               struct {
>> >> > +  #define KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE (1 << 0)
>> >> > +                       __u32 flags;
>> >> > +                       __u32 padding;
>> >> > +                       __u64 gpa;
>> >> > +                       __u64 size;
>> >> > +               } memory;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +If exit reason is KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT then it indicates that the 
>> >> > VCPU has
>> >> > +encountered a memory error which is not handled by KVM kernel module 
>> >> > and
>> >> > +userspace may choose to handle it. The 'flags' field indicates the 
>> >> > memory
>> >> > +properties of the exit.
>> >> > +
>> >> > + - KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE - indicates the memory error is caused 
>> >> > by
>> >> > +   private memory access when the bit is set. Otherwise the memory 
>> >> > error is
>> >> > +   caused by shared memory access when the bit is clear.
>> >> 
>> >> What does a shared memory access failure entail?
>> >
>> > In the context of confidential computing usages, guest can issue a
>> > shared memory access while the memory is actually private from the host
>> > point of view. This exit with bit 0 cleared gives userspace a chance to
>> > convert the private memory to shared memory on host.
>> 
>> I think this should be explicit rather than implied by the absence of
>> another flag. Sean suggested you might want flags for RWX failures so
>> maybe something like:
>> 
>>      KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_SHARED_FLAG_READ        (1 << 0)
>>      KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_SHARED_FLAG_WRITE       (1 << 1)
>>      KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_SHARED_FLAG_EXECUTE     (1 << 2)
>>         KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE            (1 << 3)
>
> Yes, but I would not add 'SHARED' to RWX, they are not share memory
> specific, private memory can also set them once introduced.

OK so how about:

        KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_READ       (1 << 0)
        KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_WRITE      (1 << 1)
        KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_EXECUTE    (1 << 2)
        KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_SHARED     (1 << 3)
        KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE    (1 << 4)

>
> Thanks,
> Chao
>> 
>> which would allow you to signal the various failure modes of the shared
>> region, or that you had accessed private memory.
>> 
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> If you envision any other failure modes it might be worth making it
>> >> explicit with additional flags.
>> >
>> > Sean mentioned some more usages[1][]2] other than the memory conversion
>> > for confidential usage. But I would leave those flags being added in the
>> > future after those usages being well discussed.
>> >
>> > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200617230052.GB27751@linux.intel.com
>> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YKxJLcg%2FWomPE422@google.com
>> >
>> >> I also wonder if a bitmask makes sense if
>> >> there can only be one reason for a failure? Maybe all that is needed is
>> >> a reason enum?
>> >
>> > Tough we only have one reason right now but we still want to leave room
>> > for future extension. Enum can express a single value at once well but
>> > bitmask makes it possible to express multiple orthogonal flags.
>> 
>> I agree if multiple orthogonal failures can occur at once a bitmask is
>> the right choice.
>> 
>> >
>> > Chao
>> >> 
>> >> > +
>> >> > +'gpa' and 'size' indicate the memory range the error occurs at. The 
>> >> > userspace
>> >> > +may handle the error and return to KVM to retry the previous memory 
>> >> > access.
>> >> > +
>> >> >  ::
>> >> >  
>> >> >      /* KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY */
>> >> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> >> > index f1ae45c10c94..fa60b032a405 100644
>> >> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> >> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> >> > @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_exit {
>> >> >  #define KVM_EXIT_RISCV_SBI        35
>> >> >  #define KVM_EXIT_RISCV_CSR        36
>> >> >  #define KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY           37
>> >> > +#define KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT     38
>> >> >  
>> >> >  /* For KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR */
>> >> >  /* Emulate instruction failed. */
>> >> > @@ -538,6 +539,14 @@ struct kvm_run {
>> >> >  #define KVM_NOTIFY_CONTEXT_INVALID     (1 << 0)
>> >> >                         __u32 flags;
>> >> >                 } notify;
>> >> > +               /* KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT */
>> >> > +               struct {
>> >> > +#define KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE   (1 << 0)
>> >> > +                       __u32 flags;
>> >> > +                       __u32 padding;
>> >> > +                       __u64 gpa;
>> >> > +                       __u64 size;
>> >> > +               } memory;
>> >> >                 /* Fix the size of the union. */
>> >> >                 char padding[256];
>> >> >         };
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> Alex Bennée
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Alex Bennée


-- 
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]