Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] docs/devel suggestions for discussion

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 01:11:48PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by:
> 
>  - adding an explicit section on maintainers
>  - reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission
>  - emphasising the importance to respectful reviews
> 
> I'm sure the language could be improved further so I humbly submit
> this RFC for discussion.
> 
> Alex Bennée (4):
>   docs/devel: add a maintainers section to development process
>   docs/devel: make language a little less code centric
>   docs/devel: simplify the minimal checklist
>   docs/devel: try and improve the language around patch review
> 
>  docs/devel/code-of-conduct.rst           |   2 +
>  docs/devel/index-process.rst             |   1 +
>  docs/devel/maintainers.rst               |  84 +++++++++++++++++++
>  docs/devel/submitting-a-patch.rst        | 101 +++++++++++++++--------
>  docs/devel/submitting-a-pull-request.rst |  12 +--
>  roms/qboot                               |   2 +-
>  6 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 docs/devel/maintainers.rst
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Modulo comments:

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature