[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:56:27 +0200 |
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:10:13 +0100
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> wrote:
> It is assumed that the whole GPA space is available to be DMA
> addressable, within a given address space limit, except for a
> tiny region before the 4G. Since Linux v5.4, VFIO validates
> whether the selected GPA is indeed valid i.e. not reserved by
> IOMMU on behalf of some specific devices or platform-defined
> restrictions, and thus failing the ioctl(VFIO_DMA_MAP) with
> -EINVAL.
>
> AMD systems with an IOMMU are examples of such platforms and
> particularly may only have these ranges as allowed:
>
> 0000000000000000 - 00000000fedfffff (0 .. 3.982G)
> 00000000fef00000 - 000000fcffffffff (3.983G .. 1011.9G)
> 0000010000000000 - ffffffffffffffff (1Tb .. 16Pb[*])
>
> We already account for the 4G hole, albeit if the guest is big
> enough we will fail to allocate a guest with >1010G due to the
> ~12G hole at the 1Tb boundary, reserved for HyperTransport (HT).
>
> [*] there is another reserved region unrelated to HT that exists
> in the 256T boundary in Fam 17h according to Errata #1286,
> documeted also in "Open-Source Register Reference for AMD Family
> 17h Processors (PUB)"
>
> When creating the region above 4G, take into account that on AMD
> platforms the HyperTransport range is reserved and hence it
> cannot be used either as GPAs. On those cases rather than
> establishing the start of ram-above-4g to be 4G, relocate instead
> to 1Tb. See AMD IOMMU spec, section 2.1.2 "IOMMU Logical
> Topology", for more information on the underlying restriction of
> IOVAs.
>
> After accounting for the 1Tb hole on AMD hosts, mtree should
> look like:
>
> 0000000000000000-000000007fffffff (prio 0, i/o):
> alias ram-below-4g @pc.ram 0000000000000000-000000007fffffff
> 0000010000000000-000001ff7fffffff (prio 0, i/o):
> alias ram-above-4g @pc.ram 0000000080000000-000000ffffffffff
>
> If the relocation is done or the address space covers it, we
> also add the the reserved HT e820 range as reserved.
>
> Default phys-bits on Qemu is TCG_PHYS_ADDR_BITS (40) which is enough
> to address 1Tb (0xff ffff ffff). On AMD platforms, if a
> ram-above-4g relocation may be desired and the CPU wasn't configured
> with a big enough phys-bits, print an error message to the user
> and do not make the relocation of the above-4g-region if phys-bits
> is too low.
>
> Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/pc.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index a79fa1b6beeb..07025b510540 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -907,6 +907,87 @@ static uint64_t pc_get_cxl_range_end(PCMachineState
> *pcms)
> return start;
> }
>
> +static hwaddr pc_max_used_gpa(PCMachineState *pcms,
> + hwaddr above_4g_mem_start,
> + uint64_t pci_hole64_size)
> +{
> + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
> +
> + if (!x86ms->above_4g_mem_size) {
> + /*
> + * 32-bit pci hole goes from
> + * end-of-low-ram (@below_4g_mem_size) to IOAPIC.
> + */
> + return IO_APIC_DEFAULT_ADDRESS - 1;
> + }
this hunk still bothers me (nothing changed wrt v5 issues around it)
issues recap: (
1. correctness of it
2. being limited to AMD only, while it seems pretty generic to me
3. should be a separate patch
)
> +
> + return pc_pci_hole64_start() + pci_hole64_size;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * AMD systems with an IOMMU have an additional hole close to the
> + * 1Tb, which are special GPAs that cannot be DMA mapped. Depending
> + * on kernel version, VFIO may or may not let you DMA map those ranges.
> + * Starting Linux v5.4 we validate it, and can't create guests on AMD
> machines
> + * with certain memory sizes. It's also wrong to use those IOVA ranges
> + * in detriment of leading to IOMMU INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST or worse.
> + * The ranges reserved for Hyper-Transport are:
> + *
> + * FD_0000_0000h - FF_FFFF_FFFFh
> + *
> + * The ranges represent the following:
> + *
> + * Base Address Top Address Use
> + *
> + * FD_0000_0000h FD_F7FF_FFFFh Reserved interrupt address space
> + * FD_F800_0000h FD_F8FF_FFFFh Interrupt/EOI IntCtl
> + * FD_F900_0000h FD_F90F_FFFFh Legacy PIC IACK
> + * FD_F910_0000h FD_F91F_FFFFh System Management
> + * FD_F920_0000h FD_FAFF_FFFFh Reserved Page Tables
> + * FD_FB00_0000h FD_FBFF_FFFFh Address Translation
> + * FD_FC00_0000h FD_FDFF_FFFFh I/O Space
> + * FD_FE00_0000h FD_FFFF_FFFFh Configuration
> + * FE_0000_0000h FE_1FFF_FFFFh Extended Configuration/Device Messages
> + * FE_2000_0000h FF_FFFF_FFFFh Reserved
> + *
> + * See AMD IOMMU spec, section 2.1.2 "IOMMU Logical Topology",
> + * Table 3: Special Address Controls (GPA) for more information.
> + */
> +#define AMD_HT_START 0xfd00000000UL
> +#define AMD_HT_END 0xffffffffffUL
> +#define AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START (AMD_HT_END + 1)
> +#define AMD_HT_SIZE (AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START - AMD_HT_START)
> +
> +static void pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start(PCMachineState *pcms,
> + uint64_t pci_hole64_size)
> +{
> + X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
> + hwaddr start = x86ms->above_4g_mem_start;
> + hwaddr maxphysaddr, maxusedaddr;
> +
> + /* Bail out if max possible address does not cross HT range */
> + if (pc_max_used_gpa(pcms, start, pci_hole64_size) < AMD_HT_START) {
move it to the caller?
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Relocating ram-above-4G requires more than TCG_PHYS_ADDR_BITS (40).
> + * So make sure phys-bits is required to be appropriately sized in order
> + * to proceed with the above-4g-region relocation and thus boot.
> + */
> + start = AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START;
> + maxphysaddr = ((hwaddr)1 << X86_CPU(first_cpu)->phys_bits) - 1;
> + maxusedaddr = pc_max_used_gpa(pcms, start, pci_hole64_size);
> + if (maxphysaddr < maxusedaddr) {
> + error_report("Address space limit 0x%"PRIx64" < 0x%"PRIx64
> + " phys-bits too low (%u) cannot avoid AMD HT range",
> + maxphysaddr, maxusedaddr,
> X86_CPU(first_cpu)->phys_bits);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + x86ms->above_4g_mem_start = start;
> +}
> +
> void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
> MemoryRegion *system_memory,
> MemoryRegion *rom_memory,
> @@ -922,12 +1003,31 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
> PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
> X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
> hwaddr cxl_base, cxl_resv_end = 0;
> + X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
>
> assert(machine->ram_size == x86ms->below_4g_mem_size +
> x86ms->above_4g_mem_size);
>
> linux_boot = (machine->kernel_filename != NULL);
>
> + /*
> + * The HyperTransport range close to the 1T boundary is unique to AMD
> + * hosts with IOMMUs enabled. Restrict the ram-above-4g relocation
> + * to above 1T to AMD vCPUs only.
> + */
> + if (IS_AMD_CPU(&cpu->env)) {
> + pc_set_amd_above_4g_mem_start(pcms, pci_hole64_size);
> +
> + /*
> + * Advertise the HT region if address space covers the reserved
> + * region or if we relocate.
> + */
> + if (x86ms->above_4g_mem_start == AMD_ABOVE_1TB_START ||
> + cpu->phys_bits >= 40) {
> + e820_add_entry(AMD_HT_START, AMD_HT_SIZE, E820_RESERVED);
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Split single memory region and use aliases to address portions of it,
> * done for backwards compatibility with older qemus.
> @@ -938,6 +1038,7 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
> 0, x86ms->below_4g_mem_size);
> memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, 0, ram_below_4g);
> e820_add_entry(0, x86ms->below_4g_mem_size, E820_RAM);
> +
stray newline?
> if (x86ms->above_4g_mem_size > 0) {
> ram_above_4g = g_malloc(sizeof(*ram_above_4g));
> memory_region_init_alias(ram_above_4g, NULL, "ram-above-4g",
- [PATCH v6 07/10] i386/pc: handle unitialized mr in pc_get_cxl_range_end(), (continued)
- [PATCH v6 07/10] i386/pc: handle unitialized mr in pc_get_cxl_range_end(), Joao Martins, 2022/07/01
- [PATCH v6 05/10] i386/pc: factor out cxl range end to helper, Joao Martins, 2022/07/01
- [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/01
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/07
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable,
Igor Mammedov <=
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/11
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/11
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/11
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Igor Mammedov, 2022/07/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Igor Mammedov, 2022/07/14
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/14
- Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] i386/pc: relocate 4g start to 1T where applicable, Joao Martins, 2022/07/14