[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/6] 9pfs: refactor 'name_idx' -> 'nvalid' in v9fs_walk()
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 4/6] 9pfs: refactor 'name_idx' -> 'nvalid' in v9fs_walk() |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:16:34 +0100 |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:07:04 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 9. März 2022 18:12:17 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > The local variable 'name_idx' is used in two loops in function v9fs_walk().
> > Let the first loop use its own variable 'nvalid' instead, which we will use
> > in subsequent patches as the number of (requested) path components
> > successfully retrieved/walked by background I/O thread.
I think walked is clear enough.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> > ---
> > hw/9pfs/9p.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > index a6d6b3f835..6cdc566866 100644
> > --- a/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > @@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ static bool same_stat_id(const struct stat *a, const
> > struct stat *b)
> >
> > static void coroutine_fn v9fs_walk(void *opaque)
> > {
> > - int name_idx;
> > + int name_idx, nvalid;
>
> Or rather renaming this nvalid -> nfetched?
>
or simply nwalked ?
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > g_autofree V9fsQID *qids = NULL;
> > int i, err = 0;
> > V9fsPath dpath, path;
> > @@ -1842,17 +1842,17 @@ static void coroutine_fn v9fs_walk(void *opaque)
> > break;
> > }
> > stbuf = fidst;
> > - for (name_idx = 0; name_idx < nwnames; name_idx++) {
> > + for (nvalid = 0; nvalid < nwnames; nvalid++) {
> > if (v9fs_request_cancelled(pdu)) {
> > err = -EINTR;
> > break;
> > }
> > if (!same_stat_id(&pdu->s->root_st, &stbuf) ||
> > - strcmp("..", wnames[name_idx].data))
> > + strcmp("..", wnames[nvalid].data))
> > {
> > err = s->ops->name_to_path(&s->ctx, &dpath,
> > - wnames[name_idx].data,
> > - &pathes[name_idx]);
> > + wnames[nvalid].data,
> > + &pathes[nvalid]);
> > if (err < 0) {
> > err = -errno;
> > break;
> > @@ -1861,13 +1861,13 @@ static void coroutine_fn v9fs_walk(void *opaque)
> > err = -EINTR;
> > break;
> > }
> > - err = s->ops->lstat(&s->ctx, &pathes[name_idx], &stbuf);
> > + err = s->ops->lstat(&s->ctx, &pathes[nvalid], &stbuf);
> > if (err < 0) {
> > err = -errno;
> > break;
> > }
> > - stbufs[name_idx] = stbuf;
> > - v9fs_path_copy(&dpath, &pathes[name_idx]);
> > + stbufs[nvalid] = stbuf;
> > + v9fs_path_copy(&dpath, &pathes[nvalid]);
> > }
> > }
> > });
>
>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] tests/9pfs: compare QIDs in fs_walk_none() test, (continued)
[PATCH 5/6] 9pfs: fix 'Twalk' to only send error if no component walked, Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/03/09
[PATCH 4/6] 9pfs: refactor 'name_idx' -> 'nvalid' in v9fs_walk(), Christian Schoenebeck, 2022/03/09