RE: hexagon container update

[Brian Cain]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Cain
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 9:25 AM
> To: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>; qemu-
> devel@nongnu.org; Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>
> Subject: RE: hexagon container update
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ..
> > Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com> writes:
> >
> ...
> > > We had some issues with the previous attempt to update the container.
> > > The linux-user "signals" test failed. Richard pointed out that the
> > > archive of the C library had what looks like a defect that would cause
> > > the test to fail.
> > >
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg849635.html
> > >
> > > I'm following up now with a workaround - the attached patch references
> > > a toolchain which avoids the problem and passes the signals test. This
> > > toolchain is based on llvm+clang 13.0.1-rc2. BTW, the release page has
> > > a signature provided in case anyone wants to verify the download:
> > > https://github.com/quic/toolchain_for_hexagon/releases/tag/13.0.1-rc2_
> > >
> > > Can we try again with this new container definition?
> > >
> > > -Brian
> > >
> > > [2. 0001-Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch --- text/x-diff;
> 0001-
> > Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch]...
> >
> > Could you send the updated patch against the current master in the usual
> > way please?
> 
> Sorry -- I should have instead asked that the patch be reviewed.  It was based
> on the current master, though.  And once it's reviewed I'll send a pull 
> request,
> right?

No, it wasn't based on master.  Apologies, please disregard.

-Brian