[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v10 06/10] ACPI ERST: build the ACPI ERST table
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v10 06/10] ACPI ERST: build the ACPI ERST table |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2021 17:56:39 -0500 |
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:57:31PM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> This builds the ACPI ERST table to inform OSPM how to communicate
> with the acpi-erst device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>
> ---
> hw/acpi/erst.c | 241
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 241 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/erst.c b/hw/acpi/erst.c
> index 81f5435..753425a 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/erst.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/erst.c
> @@ -711,6 +711,247 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps erst_reg_ops = {
> .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
> };
>
> +
> +/*******************************************************************/
> +/*******************************************************************/
> +
> +/* ACPI 4.0: Table 17-19 Serialization Instructions */
> +#define INST_READ_REGISTER 0x00
> +#define INST_READ_REGISTER_VALUE 0x01
> +#define INST_WRITE_REGISTER 0x02
> +#define INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE 0x03
> +#define INST_NOOP 0x04
> +#define INST_LOAD_VAR1 0x05
> +#define INST_LOAD_VAR2 0x06
> +#define INST_STORE_VAR1 0x07
> +#define INST_ADD 0x08
> +#define INST_SUBTRACT 0x09
> +#define INST_ADD_VALUE 0x0A
> +#define INST_SUBTRACT_VALUE 0x0B
> +#define INST_STALL 0x0C
> +#define INST_STALL_WHILE_TRUE 0x0D
> +#define INST_SKIP_NEXT_INSTRUCTION_IF_TRUE 0x0E
> +#define INST_GOTO 0x0F
> +#define INST_SET_SRC_ADDRESS_BASE 0x10
> +#define INST_SET_DST_ADDRESS_BASE 0x11
> +#define INST_MOVE_DATA 0x12
> +
I would create wrappers for the specific uses that we do have. Leave the
rest alone.
You just use 4 of these right? And a bunch of parameters are
always the same. E.g. flags always 0, address always same.
> +/* ACPI 4.0: 17.4.1.2 Serialization Instruction Entries */
> +static void build_serialization_instruction_entry(GArray *table_data,
> + uint8_t serialization_action,
> + uint8_t instruction,
> + uint8_t flags,
> + uint8_t register_bit_width,
maybe make it width in bytes, then you do not need a switch.
> + uint64_t register_address,
> + uint64_t value,
> + uint64_t mask)
> +{
> + /* ACPI 4.0: Table 17-18 Serialization Instruction Entry */
> + struct AcpiGenericAddress gas;
> +
> + /* Serialization Action */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, serialization_action, 1);
> + /* Instruction */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, instruction , 1);
> + /* Flags */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, flags , 1);
> + /* Reserved */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0 , 1);
> + /* Register Region */
> + gas.space_id = AML_SYSTEM_MEMORY;
> + gas.bit_width = register_bit_width;
> + gas.bit_offset = 0;
> + switch (register_bit_width) {
> + case 8:
> + gas.access_width = 1;
> + break;
> + case 16:
> + gas.access_width = 2;
> + break;
> + case 32:
> + gas.access_width = 3;
> + break;
> + case 64:
> + gas.access_width = 4;
> + break;
> + default:
> + gas.access_width = 0;
> + break;
does this default actually work?
> + }
> + gas.address = register_address;
> + build_append_gas_from_struct(table_data, &gas);
> + /* Value */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, value , 8);
> + /* Mask */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, mask , 8);
> +}
> +
> +/* ACPI 4.0: 17.4.1 Serialization Action Table */
> +void build_erst(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, Object *erst_dev,
> + const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id)
> +{
> + GArray *table_instruction_data;
> + unsigned action;
> + pcibus_t bar0, bar1;
> + AcpiTable table = { .sig = "ERST", .rev = 1, .oem_id = oem_id,
> + .oem_table_id = oem_table_id };
> +
> + bar0 = (pcibus_t)pci_get_bar_addr(PCI_DEVICE(erst_dev), 0);
> + trace_acpi_erst_pci_bar_0(bar0);
> + bar1 = (pcibus_t)pci_get_bar_addr(PCI_DEVICE(erst_dev), 1);
why do we need the cast here?
Also assignment at declaration point will be cleaner, won't it?
> + trace_acpi_erst_pci_bar_1(bar1);
bar1 seems unused ... why do we bother with it just for trace?
> +
> +#define MASK8 0x00000000000000FFUL
> +#define MASK16 0x000000000000FFFFUL
> +#define MASK32 0x00000000FFFFFFFFUL
> +#define MASK64 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUL
can't we just pass # of bytes?
> +
> + /*
> + * Serialization Action Table
> + * The serialization action table must be generated first
> + * so that its size can be known in order to populate the
> + * Instruction Entry Count field.
> + */
> + table_instruction_data = g_array_new(FALSE, FALSE, sizeof(char));
> +
> + /* Serialization Instruction Entries */
> + action = ACTION_BEGIN_WRITE_OPERATION;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_BEGIN_READ_OPERATION;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_BEGIN_CLEAR_OPERATION;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_END_OPERATION;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_SET_RECORD_OFFSET;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER , 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET , 0, MASK32);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_EXECUTE_OPERATION;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET , ERST_EXECUTE_OPERATION_MAGIC, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_CHECK_BUSY_STATUS;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER_VALUE , 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0x01, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_GET_COMMAND_STATUS;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER , 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_GET_RECORD_IDENTIFIER;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER , 0, 64,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0, MASK64);
> +
> + action = ACTION_SET_RECORD_IDENTIFIER;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER , 0, 64,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET , 0, MASK64);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_GET_RECORD_COUNT;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER , 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0, MASK32);
> +
> + action = ACTION_BEGIN_DUMMY_WRITE_OPERATION;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> +
> + action = ACTION_GET_ERROR_LOG_ADDRESS_RANGE;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER , 0, 64,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0, MASK64);
> +
> + action = ACTION_GET_ERROR_LOG_ADDRESS_LENGTH;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER , 0, 64,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0, MASK32);
> +
> + action = ACTION_GET_ERROR_LOG_ADDRESS_RANGE_ATTRIBUTES;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER , 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0, MASK32);
> +
> + action = ACTION_GET_EXECUTE_OPERATION_TIMINGS;
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, 32,
> + bar0 + ERST_ACTION_OFFSET, action, MASK8);
> + build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data,
> + action, INST_READ_REGISTER , 0, 64,
> + bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0, MASK64);
> +
> + /* Serialization Header */
> + acpi_table_begin(&table, table_data);
> +
> + /* Serialization Header Size */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 48, 4);
> +
> + /* Reserved */
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0, 4);
> +
> + /*
> + * Instruction Entry Count
> + * Each instruction entry is 32 bytes
> + */
assert that it's a multiple of 32 maybe
> + build_append_int_noprefix(table_data,
> + (table_instruction_data->len / 32), 4);
> +
> + /* Serialization Instruction Entries */
> + g_array_append_vals(table_data, table_instruction_data->data,
> + table_instruction_data->len);
> + g_array_free(table_instruction_data, TRUE);
> +
> + acpi_table_end(linker, &table);
> +}
> +
> /*******************************************************************/
> /*******************************************************************/
> static int erst_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
- [PATCH v10 05/10] ACPI ERST: support for ACPI ERST feature, (continued)
Re: [PATCH v10 06/10] ACPI ERST: build the ACPI ERST table,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
[PATCH v10 07/10] ACPI ERST: create ACPI ERST table for pc/x86 machines, Eric DeVolder, 2021/12/09
[PATCH v10 10/10] ACPI ERST: step 6 of bios-tables-test.c, Eric DeVolder, 2021/12/09