qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] replay: improve determinism of virtio-net


From: Pavel Dovgalyuk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replay: improve determinism of virtio-net
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 07:46:47 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1

ping

On 17.05.2021 16:04, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
virtio-net device uses bottom halves for callbacks.
These callbacks should be deterministic, because they affect VM state.
This patch replaces BH invocations with corresponding replay functions,
making them deterministic in record/replay mode.
This patch also disables guest announce timers for record/replay,
because they break correct loadvm in deterministic mode.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>
---
  hw/net/virtio-net.c |   13 +++++++++----
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
index 6b7e8dd04e..e876363236 100644
--- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
+++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
  #include "net_rx_pkt.h"
  #include "hw/virtio/vhost.h"
+#include "sysemu/replay.h"
#define VIRTIO_NET_VM_VERSION 11 @@ -394,7 +395,7 @@ static void virtio_net_set_status(struct VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t status)
                  timer_mod(q->tx_timer,
                                 qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) + 
n->tx_timeout);
              } else {
-                qemu_bh_schedule(q->tx_bh);
+                replay_bh_schedule_event(q->tx_bh);
              }
          } else {
              if (q->tx_timer) {
@@ -2546,7 +2547,7 @@ static void virtio_net_handle_tx_bh(VirtIODevice *vdev, 
VirtQueue *vq)
          return;
      }
      virtio_queue_set_notification(vq, 0);
-    qemu_bh_schedule(q->tx_bh);
+    replay_bh_schedule_event(q->tx_bh);
  }
static void virtio_net_tx_timer(void *opaque)
@@ -2602,7 +2603,7 @@ static void virtio_net_tx_bh(void *opaque)
      /* If we flush a full burst of packets, assume there are
       * more coming and immediately reschedule */
      if (ret >= n->tx_burst) {
-        qemu_bh_schedule(q->tx_bh);
+        replay_bh_schedule_event(q->tx_bh);
          q->tx_waiting = 1;
          return;
      }
@@ -2616,7 +2617,7 @@ static void virtio_net_tx_bh(void *opaque)
          return;
      } else if (ret > 0) {
          virtio_queue_set_notification(q->tx_vq, 0);
-        qemu_bh_schedule(q->tx_bh);
+        replay_bh_schedule_event(q->tx_bh);
          q->tx_waiting = 1;
      }
  }
@@ -3206,6 +3207,10 @@ static void virtio_net_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
Error **errp)
          n->host_features |= (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU);
      }
+ if (replay_mode != REPLAY_MODE_NONE) {
+        n->host_features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE);
+    }
+
      if (n->net_conf.duplex_str) {
          if (strncmp(n->net_conf.duplex_str, "half", 5) == 0) {
              n->net_conf.duplex = DUPLEX_HALF;





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]