Re: [PATCH] linux-user: make process_pending_signals thread-safe

[Peter Maydell]

On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 11:37, Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 27 2021 at 11:16:56 AM +0100, Peter Maydell
> <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> > If we do want to change from sigprocmask() to pthread_sigmask(), we
> > should be consistent about doing that, not just change this call
> > only.)
> On that note, do you think it would worthwhile to have a Coccinelle
> script replace all instances of sigprocmask with pthread_sigmask (in
> linux-user, of course)?

What issue are we trying to fix by making this change ?

There are only 7 calls so a coccinelle script seems like overkill.

thanks
-- PMM