qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Adding devices via QMP's device_add don't have their bootindex


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: Fwd: Adding devices via QMP's device_add don't have their bootindex setting respected
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 14:55:34 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1

On 18/05/21 14:22, Thomas Parrott wrote:
Due to QEMU moving towards a QMP configuration mechanism and away from config file support, the LXD team are currently in the process of migrating to using QMP to add devices to VMs (so that we can support the use of QEMU 6.0).

If the only issue you have is with -spice, that's just a bug that we need to fix. -readconfig is still supposed to work, even though -writeconfig is deprecated and I'd like to remove it as soon as 6.1.

In particular, the issue you reported below is not a bug. Devices that are added after startup are considered hotplugged, and the boot index list is frozen until the next reset. QMP-based configuration of coldplugged devices is in the works, but unfortunately it is not yet ready.

Paolo

Currently we are using the `-S` flag to freeze CPU at startup, then using QMP to add NIC devices via the `device_add` command, and then using the `cont` command to start the VM guest.

This is working mostly fine, but there is one issue; the provided "bootindex" property is not respected.

E.g.

device_add {"addr":"00.0","bootindex":"0","bus":"qemu_pcie4","driver":"virtio-net-pci","id":"dev-lxd_eth0","mac":"00:16:3e:0c:69:e7","mq":"on","multifunction":"off","netdev":"lxd_eth0","vectors":"6"}

The device is seen within the VM guest and the VM BIOS, but its boot order is last rather than first.

We've also tried using a non-zero bootindex of 1 and that has the same effect.

After discussions on #qemu IRC channel, we found that running `system_reset` after adding the devices allowed the `bootindex` property to be respected.

So this looks like bug. Perhaps we can discuss it in one of the forthcoming community calls?

Thanks
Tom Parrott




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]