qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] virtio: Improve boot time of virtio-scsi-pci and virt


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] virtio: Improve boot time of virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 10:32:59 +0200

On Wed, 12 May 2021 17:05:53 +0100
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 06:59:01PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> > a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
> > of vCPUs.
> > 
> > Exemple with a pseries guest on a bi-POWER9 socket system (128 HW threads):
> > 
> >               virtio-scsi      virtio-blk
> > 
> > 1           0m20.922s       0m21.346s
> > 2           0m21.230s       0m20.350s
> > 4           0m21.761s       0m20.997s
> > 8           0m22.770s       0m20.051s
> > 16          0m22.038s       0m19.994s
> > 32          0m22.928s       0m20.803s
> > 64          0m26.583s       0m22.953s
> > 128         0m41.273s       0m32.333s
> > 256         2m4.727s        1m16.924s
> > 384         6m5.563s        3m26.186s
> > 
> > Both perf and gprof indicate that QEMU is hogging CPUs when setting up
> > the ioeventfds:
> > 
> >  67.88%  swapper         [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] power_pmu_enable
> >   9.47%  qemu-kvm        [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] smp_call_function_single
> >   8.64%  qemu-kvm        [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] power_pmu_enable
> > =>2.79%  qemu-kvm        qemu-kvm           [.] 
> > memory_region_ioeventfd_before
> > =>2.12%  qemu-kvm        qemu-kvm           [.] 
> > address_space_update_ioeventfds
> >   0.56%  kworker/8:0-mm  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] smp_call_function_single
> > 
> > address_space_update_ioeventfds() is called when committing an MR
> > transaction, i.e. for each ioeventfd with the current code base,
> > and it internally loops on all ioventfds:
> > 
> > static void address_space_update_ioeventfds(AddressSpace *as)
> > {
> > [...]
> >     FOR_EACH_FLAT_RANGE(fr, view) {
> >         for (i = 0; i < fr->mr->ioeventfd_nb; ++i) {
> > 
> > This means that the setup of ioeventfds for these devices has
> > quadratic time complexity.
> > 
> > This series simply changes the device models to extend the transaction
> > to all virtqueueues, like already done in the past in the generic
> > code with 710fccf80d78 ("virtio: improve virtio devices initialization
> > time").
> > 
> > Only virtio-scsi and virtio-blk are covered here, but a similar change
> > might also be beneficial to other device types such as host-scsi-pci,
> > vhost-user-scsi-pci and vhost-user-blk-pci.
> > 
> >               virtio-scsi      virtio-blk
> > 
> > 1           0m21.271s       0m22.076s
> > 2           0m20.912s       0m19.716s
> > 4           0m20.508s       0m19.310s
> > 8           0m21.374s       0m20.273s
> > 16          0m21.559s       0m21.374s
> > 32          0m22.532s       0m21.271s
> > 64          0m26.550s       0m22.007s
> > 128         0m29.115s       0m27.446s
> > 256         0m44.752s       0m41.004s
> > 384         1m2.884s        0m58.023s
> > 
> > This should fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927108
> > which reported the issue for virtio-scsi-pci.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Add some comments (Stefan)
> > - Drop optimization on the error path in patch 2 (Stefan)
> > 
> > Changes since RFC:
> > 
> > As suggested by Stefan, splimplify the code by directly beginning and
> > committing the memory transaction from the device model, without all
> > the virtio specific proxying code and no changes needed in the memory
> > subsystem.
> > 
> > Greg Kurz (4):
> >   virtio-blk: Fix rollback path in virtio_blk_data_plane_start()
> >   virtio-blk: Configure all host notifiers in a single MR transaction
> >   virtio-scsi: Set host notifiers and callbacks separately
> >   virtio-scsi: Configure all host notifiers in a single MR transaction
> > 
> >  hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  hw/scsi/virtio-scsi-dataplane.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.26.3
> > 
> 
> Thanks, applied to my block tree:
> https://gitlab.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block
> 

Hi Stefan,

It seems that Michael already merged the previous version of this
patch set with its latest PR.

https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/6005ee07c380cbde44292f5f6c96e7daa70f4f7d

It is thus missing the v1->v2 changes. Basically some comments to
clarify the optimization we're doing with the MR transaction and
the removal of the optimization on an error path.

The optimization on the error path isn't needed indeed but it
doesn't hurt. No need to change that now that the patches are
upstream.

I can post a follow-up patch to add the missing comments though.
While here, I'd even add these comments in the generic
virtio_device_*_ioeventfd_impl() calls as well, since they already
have the very same optimization.

Anyway, I guess you can drop the patches from your tree.

Cheers,

--
Greg

> Stefan

Attachment: pgppHMeoEvK8f.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]