qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] tcg: Use correct trap number for page faults on *BSD syst


From: Warner Losh
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcg: Use correct trap number for page faults on *BSD systems
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 08:15:40 -0600



On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 6:23 AM Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
On 5/6/21 12:53 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 11:51 AM Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org
> <mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 5/6/21 10:38 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>      > The trap number for a page fault on BSD systems is T_PAGEFLT not 0xe. 0xe is
>      > used by Linux and represents the intel hardware trap vector. The BSD
>     kernels,
>      > however, translate this to T_PAGEFLT in their Xpage, Xtrap0e, Xtrap14,
>     etc fault
>      > handlers. This is true for i386 and x86_64, though the name of the trap
>     hanlder
>      > can very on the flavor of BSD. As far as I can tell, Linux doesn't provide a
>      > define for this value. Invent a new one (PAGE_FAULT_TRAP) and use it
>     instead to
>      > avoid uglier ifdefs.
>      >
>      > Signed-off-by: Mark Johnston<markj@FreeBSD.org>
>      > Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock<nox@FreeBSD.org>
>      > [ Rework to avoid ifdefs and expand it to i386 ]
>      > Signed-off-by: Warner Losh<imp@bsdimp.com <mailto:imp@bsdimp.com>>
>      > ---
>      >   accel/tcg/user-exec.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>      >   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>     Queued to tcg-next, thanks.
>
>     Looks like this area could use a bit of cleanup...
>
>
> No arguments from me there... Thanks!

Dequeueing.

This doesn't work on our "make vm-build-{freebsd,openbsd} images, as Peter
helpfully pointed out after I sent the pull request.  I don't know enough about
any of the BSDs to know what's expected.

OK. I'll take a closer look. It's survived the make vm-build-freebsd in the past, so
I'm a little surprised at this...

Warner 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]