[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug 1858461] Re: Please refactor linux-user/mips/cpu_loop.c
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
[Bug 1858461] Re: Please refactor linux-user/mips/cpu_loop.c |
Date: |
Sun, 09 May 2021 16:03:47 -0000 |
This is an automated cleanup. This bug report has been moved to QEMU's
new bug tracker on gitlab.com and thus gets marked as 'invalid' now.
Please continue with the discussion here:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/241
** Changed in: qemu
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues #241
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/241
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858461
Title:
Please refactor linux-user/mips/cpu_loop.c
Status in QEMU:
Invalid
Bug description:
Hello. I am working with qemu on test images. I've added a new syscall
(436) to qemu but received ENOSYS from mips application.
Please open "linux-user/mips/cpu_loop.c". I've added at the end of
"mips_syscall_args" the following:
```
MIPS_SYS(sys_getdents64_x32, 3)
```
But
```
syscall_num = env->active_tc.gpr[2] - 4000;
if (syscall_num >= sizeof(mips_syscall_args)) {
ret = -TARGET_ENOSYS;
```
returns -TARGET_ENOSYS
We can see that "linux-user/mips/cpu_loop.c" differs a lot from
"linux-user/arm/cpu_loop.c". Arm has it's own "ARM_NR_BASE" and etc.
Can you please refactor mips cpu loop in the same way as arm? Thank
you.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1858461/+subscriptions