Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] linux-user/s390x: some signal fixes

[Cornelia Huck]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:33:53 -0700
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

> Version 2 splits lazy do-it-all patch.
> Patch 1 has an additional fix, so I dropped the r-b.
> 
> r~
> 
> Richard Henderson (15):
>   linux-user/s390x: Fix sigframe types
>   linux-user/s390x: Use uint16_t for signal retcode
>   linux-user/s390x: Remove PSW_ADDR_AMODE
>   linux-user/s390x: Remove restore_sigregs return value
>   linux-user/s390x: Fix trace in restore_regs
>   linux-user/s390x: Fix sigcontext sregs value
>   linux-user/s390x: Use tswap_sigset in setup_rt_frame
>   linux-user/s390x: Tidy save_sigregs
>   linux-user/s390x: Clean up single-use gotos in signal.c
>   linux-user/s390x: Set psw.mask properly for the signal handler
>   linux-user/s390x: Add stub sigframe argument for last_break
>   linux-user/s390x: Fix frame_addr corruption in setup_frame
>   linux-user/s390x: Add build asserts for sigset sizes
>   linux-user/s390x: Clean up signal.c
>   linux-user/s390x: Handle vector regs in signal stack
> 
>  linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 280 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
> 

I assume the route-to-upstream for this is through the linux-user tree
and not the s390x tree, right?