qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug with Windows tap network when running qemu-system-ppc with Mac O


From: Howard Spoelstra
Subject: Re: Bug with Windows tap network when running qemu-system-ppc with Mac OS 9 guest
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:58:42 +0100

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:00 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 4:49 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 在 2021/3/26 下午4:21, BALATON Zoltan 写道:
> > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Howard Spoelstra wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 2:50 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Howard,
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:35 AM Peter Maydell
> > >>> <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> (adding the relevant people to the cc list)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 17:26, Howard Spoelstra <hsp.cat7@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> When running qemu-system-ppc with Mac OS guest, the guest crashes
> > >>>>> when
> > >>>>> using a tap network connection. Openvpn 2.4.9-I601-win10 is installed
> > >>>>> with TAP-Windows 9.24.2. A tap connection called TapQemu is bridged
> > >>>>> with the default ethernet connection. It gets activated when I start
> > >>>>> qemu.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> To reproduce, compile qemu-system-ppc from current source and run:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> qemu-system-ppc.exe ^
> > >>>>> -L pc-bios ^
> > >>>>> -M mac99 ^
> > >>>>> -m 128 ^
> > >>>>> -sdl -serial stdio ^
> > >>>>> -boot c ^
> > >>>>> -drive file=C:\Mac-disks\9.2.img,format=raw,media=disk ^
> > >>>>> -device sungem,netdev=network01 -netdev
> > >>>>> tap,ifname=TapQemu,id=network01
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I bisected to the commit below. Thanks for looking into this.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for reporting.
> > >>>
> > >>> Can you please provide some further information:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. Does "-net user" work on Windows?
> > >>> 2. If running QEMU under Linux, does "-net tap" or "-net user" work?
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Bin
> > >>
> > >> Hello Bin,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for getting back to me. I forgot to mention that reverting the
> > >> above patch restores functionality. And that other applications using
> > >> the same tap device work correctly.
> > >> In answer to your questions:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Yes, slirp works on Windows 10 with this setup.
> > >> 2. Yes, in Linux both tap and slirp work.
> > >>
> > >> My Windows build is done with a fully up to date msys2 installation.
> > >>
> > >> I tried to debug in Windows:
> > >> (gdb) run
> > >> Starting program: c:\qemu-master-msys2\qemu-system-ppc.exe -L pc-bios
> > >> -M mac99 -m 128 -sdl -serial stdio -boot c -drive
> > >> "file=C:\Mac-disks\9.2-usb-pci-ddk.img,format=raw,media=disk" -device
> > >> "sungem,netdev=network01" -netdev "tap,ifname=TapQemu,id=network01" -S
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x1f00]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x2f84]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x3524]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x2b8c]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x368c]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x3668]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0xf4c]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x49c]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x1d4c]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x7fc]
> > >> [Thread 13304.0x7fc exited with code 0]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x357c]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x7c0]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x3564]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x26f4]
> > >> [New Thread 13304.0x2f68]
> > >>
> > >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > >> 0x00007ffb9edea991 in ?? () from c:\qemu-master-msys2\libglib-2.0-0.dll
> > >> (gdb) bt
> > >> #0  0x00007ffb9edea991 in ?? () from
> > >> c:\qemu-master-msys2\libglib-2.0-0.dll
> > >> #1  0x000800000480bf50 in ?? ()
> > >> Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> > >> (gdb)
> > >>
> > >> Even before I could attach to the process.
> > >
> > > If you run QEMU under gdb you don't have to attach to it but to get a
> > > meaningful backtrace you should configure and compile QEMU with
> > > --enable-debug (this will make it run slower so not recommended
> > > normally but for debugging that would be needed). If the stack is
> > > really corrupted then you may not get a useful backtrace or it may be
> > > a problem with gdb on Windows. I've found that gdb on Windows works
> > > for simple things but could give bad results for more complex stuff.
> > > WinDbg may be better but it's harder to use (needs some registry
> > > change I think to enable core dumps then you could open and analyze
> > > core dumps with it or it should be able to run command directly but I
> > > don't know how that works).
> > >
> > > Another idea: maybe you could check other threads in gdb. Not sure if
> > > that would reveal anything but may worth a try. I think the commands
> > > you need are "info threads" and "apply all bt" or something similar.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > BALATON Zoltan
> > >
> >
> > It looks to me the patch tires to recycle a temporary buffer to tap thread.
> >
> > Please try to attached fix to see it if works.
>
> Yep, good catch, thanks! This patch looks correct to me.
>
> Regards,
> Bin

Hi,

While the patch applies, it will not compile:

../net/tap-win32.c: In function 'tap_win32_send':
../net/tap-win32.c:697:18: error: assignment to 'uint8_t' {aka
'unsigned char'} from 'uint8_t *' {aka 'unsigned char *'} makes
integer from pointer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
  697 |         orig_buf = buf;
      |                  ^
../net/tap-win32.c:707:42: error: passing argument 2 of
'tap_win32_free_buffer' makes pointer from integer without a cast
[-Werror=int-conversion]
  707 |         tap_win32_free_buffer(s->handle, orig_buf);
      |                                          ^~~~~~~~
      |                                          |
      |                                          uint8_t {aka unsigned char}
../net/tap-win32.c:590:44: note: expected 'uint8_t *' {aka 'unsigned
char *'} but argument is of type 'uint8_t' {aka 'unsigned char'}
  590 |                                   uint8_t *pbuf)
      |                                   ~~~~~~~~~^~~~


Best,
Howard



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]