Re: [RFC v11 28/55] target/arm: refactor exception and cpu code

[Richard Henderson]

On 3/25/21 5:59 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> > Isn't tcg/tcg-* redundant?
>
> I considered that, and at some point I had "cpu.c" for x86 too. After working 
> on it for a while, I noticed how
> it got really confusing in practice to have files called just "cpu.c" when working on 
> them, just too many files are called "cpu.c". It was confusing.
>
> I also like the extra emphasis on the accel for this:
>
> kvm/kvm.c
> kvm/kvm-cpu.c
> kvm/kvm-stub.c
>
> tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> tcg/tcg-stub.c

But then you go and invent

cpu-sve.c
kvm/cpu-sve.c
tcg/cpu-sve.c

etc.  So, please make up your mind.


r~