qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 2/5] tests/unit/test-block-iothread: fix maybe-uninitialized error


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: [PULL 2/5] tests/unit/test-block-iothread: fix maybe-uninitialized error on GCC 11
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 18:18:30 +0100

From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>

When building qemu with GCC 11, test-block-iothread produces the following
warning:

../tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c:148:11: error: ‘buf’ may be used
uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

This is caused by buf[512] left uninitialized and passed to
bdrv_save_vmstate() that expects a const uint8_t *, so the compiler
assumes it will be read and expects the parameter to be initialized.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210319112218.49609-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c b/tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c
index 3f866a35c6..8cf172cb7a 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void test_sync_op_pread(BdrvChild *c)
 
 static void test_sync_op_pwrite(BdrvChild *c)
 {
-    uint8_t buf[512];
+    uint8_t buf[512] = { 0 };
     int ret;
 
     /* Success */
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void test_sync_op_blk_pread(BlockBackend *blk)
 
 static void test_sync_op_blk_pwrite(BlockBackend *blk)
 {
-    uint8_t buf[512];
+    uint8_t buf[512] = { 0 };
     int ret;
 
     /* Success */
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static void test_sync_op_load_vmstate(BdrvChild *c)
 
 static void test_sync_op_save_vmstate(BdrvChild *c)
 {
-    uint8_t buf[512];
+    uint8_t buf[512] = { 0 };
     int ret;
 
     /* Error: Driver does not support snapshots */
-- 
2.27.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]