[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH for 6.0 v2] hw/intc/i8259: Refactor pic_read_irq() to avoid u
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH for 6.0 v2] hw/intc/i8259: Refactor pic_read_irq() to avoid uninitialized variable |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:28:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 |
On 3/18/21 5:24 PM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Some compiler versions are smart enough to detect a potentially
>> uninitialized variable, but are not smart enough to detect that this
>> cannot happen due to the code flow:
>>
>> ../hw/intc/i8259.c: In function ‘pic_read_irq’:
>> ../hw/intc/i8259.c:203:13: error: ‘irq2’ may be used uninitialized in
>> this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> 203 | irq = irq2 + 8;
>> | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Restrict irq2 variable use to the inner statement.
>>
>> Fixes: 78ef2b6989f ("i8259: Reorder intack in pic_read_irq")
>> Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Supersedes: <20210318154738.27094-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/intc/i8259.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c
>> index 344fd04db14..52c039c6c03 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/i8259.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/i8259.c
>> @@ -176,10 +176,12 @@ static void pic_intack(PICCommonState *s, int irq)
>> int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d)
>> {
>> PICCommonState *s = PIC_COMMON(d);
>> - int irq, irq2, intno;
>> + int irq, intno;
>>
>> irq = pic_get_irq(s);
>> if (irq >= 0) {
>> + int irq2;
>> +
>> if (irq == 2) {
>> irq2 = pic_get_irq(slave_pic);
>> if (irq2 >= 0) {
>> @@ -189,8 +191,11 @@ int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d)
>> irq2 = 7;
>> }
>> intno = slave_pic->irq_base + irq2;
>> + pic_intack(s, irq);
>> + irq = irq2 + 8;
>> } else {
>> intno = s->irq_base + irq;
>> + pic_intack(s, irq);
>> }
>> pic_intack(s, irq);
>
> Do you still need this pic_intack() here or did you intend to move it in
> the if above?
I forgot to remove it indeed, thanks!
>> } else {
>> @@ -199,10 +204,6 @@ int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d)
>> intno = s->irq_base + irq;
>> }
>>
>> - if (irq == 2) {
>> - irq = irq2 + 8;
>> - }
>> -
>> #ifdef DEBUG_IRQ_LATENCY
>> printf("IRQ%d latency=%0.3fus\n",
>> irq,
>>