qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] target/m68k: add M68K_FEATURE_UNALIGNED_DATA feature


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] target/m68k: add M68K_FEATURE_UNALIGNED_DATA feature
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 20:47:50 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

Le 08/03/2021 à 13:11, Mark Cave-Ayland a écrit :
> According to the M68040UM Appendix D the requirement for data accesses to be
> word aligned is only for the 68000, 68008 and 68010 CPUs. Later CPUs from the
> 68020 onwards will allow unaligned data accesses but at the cost of being less
> efficient.
> 
> Add a new M68K_FEATURE_UNALIGNED_DATA feature to specify that data accesses 
> are
> not required to be word aligned, and don't perform the alignment on the stack
> pointer when taking an exception if this feature is not selected.
> 
> This is required because the MacOS DAFB driver attempts to call an A-trap
> with a byte-aligned stack pointer during initialisation and without this the
> stack pointer is off by one when the A-trap returns.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
> ---
>  target/m68k/cpu.c       | 1 +
>  target/m68k/cpu.h       | 2 ++
>  target/m68k/op_helper.c | 5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/m68k/cpu.c b/target/m68k/cpu.c
> index 37d2ed9dc7..a14874b4da 100644
> --- a/target/m68k/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/m68k/cpu.c
> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ static void m68020_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
>      m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_CAS);
>      m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_CHK2);
>      m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_MSP);
> +    m68k_set_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_UNALIGNED_DATA);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/target/m68k/cpu.h b/target/m68k/cpu.h
> index ce558e9b03..402c86c876 100644
> --- a/target/m68k/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/m68k/cpu.h
> @@ -527,6 +527,8 @@ enum m68k_features {
>      M68K_FEATURE_MOVEP,
>      /* MOVEC insn. (from 68010) */
>      M68K_FEATURE_MOVEC,
> +    /* Unaligned data accesses (680[2346]0) */
> +    M68K_FEATURE_UNALIGNED_DATA,
>  };
>  
>  static inline int m68k_feature(CPUM68KState *env, int feature)
> diff --git a/target/m68k/op_helper.c b/target/m68k/op_helper.c
> index 59a6448296..3fa7b7e19e 100644
> --- a/target/m68k/op_helper.c
> +++ b/target/m68k/op_helper.c
> @@ -348,7 +348,10 @@ static void m68k_interrupt_all(CPUM68KState *env, int 
> is_hw)
>      cpu_m68k_set_sr(env, sr);
>      sp = env->aregs[7];
>  
> -    sp &= ~1;
> +    if (!m68k_feature(env, M68K_FEATURE_UNALIGNED_DATA)) {
> +        sp &= ~1;
> +    }
> +
>      if (cs->exception_index == EXCP_ACCESS) {
>          if (env->mmu.fault) {
>              cpu_abort(cs, "DOUBLE MMU FAULT\n");
> 

Applied to my m68k-for-6.0 branch

Thanks,
Laurent




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]