qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 08/23] accel: kvm: Add aligment assert for kvm_log_clear_one_slot


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [PULL 08/23] accel: kvm: Add aligment assert for kvm_log_clear_one_slot
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 11:54:04 +0100

From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>

The parameters start and size are transfered from QEMU memory
emulation layer. It can promise that they are TARGET_PAGE_SIZE
aligned. However, KVM needs they are qemu_real_page_size aligned.

Though no caller breaks this aligned requirement currently, we'd
better add an explicit assert to avoid future breaking.

Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201217014941.22872-3-zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index ffce83f1a7..f88a52393f 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -673,6 +673,10 @@ out:
 #define KVM_CLEAR_LOG_ALIGN  (qemu_real_host_page_size << KVM_CLEAR_LOG_SHIFT)
 #define KVM_CLEAR_LOG_MASK   (-KVM_CLEAR_LOG_ALIGN)
 
+/*
+ * As the granule of kvm dirty log is qemu_real_host_page_size,
+ * @start and @size are expected and restricted to align to it.
+ */
 static int kvm_log_clear_one_slot(KVMSlot *mem, int as_id, uint64_t start,
                                   uint64_t size)
 {
@@ -682,6 +686,9 @@ static int kvm_log_clear_one_slot(KVMSlot *mem, int as_id, 
uint64_t start,
     unsigned long *bmap_clear = NULL, psize = qemu_real_host_page_size;
     int ret;
 
+    /* Make sure start and size are qemu_real_host_page_size aligned */
+    assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(start | size, psize));
+
     /*
      * We need to extend either the start or the size or both to
      * satisfy the KVM interface requirement.  Firstly, do the start
-- 
2.29.2





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]