qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] docker: Base Fedora MinGW cross containers on the base Fedor


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docker: Base Fedora MinGW cross containers on the base Fedora image
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:11:22 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0

On 3/4/21 3:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:00:04PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 3/3/21 1:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:42:22PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> The only difference between fedora-winXX-cross.docker and
>>>> fedora.docker is the specific QEMU_CONFIGURE_OPTS environment
>>>> variable. All the rest can be inherited from the generic Fedora
>>>> image.
>>>
>>> This is relying on the base Fedora image already having the
>>> mingw packages installed. My series to automate creation of
>>> the container dockerfiles removes those entirely, so we have
>>> strictly separate native and mingw images for Fedora:
>>>
>>>   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-01/msg03123.html
>>
>> I'm a bit confused. So instead of having one single big image,
>> you prefer to have multiple ones.
>>
>> I stopped using the fedora-winXX-cross because they lacks ccache,
>> and the "big" fedora image contains the mingwXX toolchains.
>>
>> I'll wait you respin your series and test the new created containers
>> to see if they fit my needs.
> 
> ccache will be present in any of the containers I auto-generate for
> QEMU using lcitool, as I agree its a very useful part o fthe toolchain.
> So when i convert the winXXX-cross containers, they'll gain ccache
> (and alot of other missing mingw pieces)

Cool, looking forward to QEMU using lcitool :)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]