[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file
From: |
Li Feng |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:49:43 +0800 |
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> 于2020年12月8日周二 下午9:45写道:
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:59:37PM +0800, Li Feng wrote:
> > This patch addresses this issue:
> > When accessing a volume on an NFS filesystem without supporting the file
> > lock,
> > tools, like qemu-img, will complain "Failed to lock byte 100".
> >
> > In the original code, the qemu_has_ofd_lock will test the lock on the
> > "/dev/null" pseudo-file. Actually, the file.locking is per-drive property,
> > which depends on the underlay filesystem.
>
> IIUC, the problem you're describing is one of whether the filesystem
> supports fcntl locking at all, which is indeed a per-FS check.
>
> The QEMU code being changed though is just about detecting whether
> the host OS supports OFD to not, which is supposed to be a kernel
> level feature applied universally to all FS types.
>
> >
> > In this patch, make the 'qemu_has_ofd_lock' with a filename be more generic
> > and reasonable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Feng <fengli@smartx.com>
> > ---
> > block/file-posix.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-------------
> > include/qemu/osdep.h | 2 +-
> > tests/test-image-locking.c | 2 +-
> > util/osdep.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
> > index 806764f7e3..03be1b188c 100644
> > --- a/block/file-posix.c
> > +++ b/block/file-posix.c
> > @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static int raw_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
> > *options,
> > switch (locking) {
> > case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
> > s->use_lock = true;
> > - if (!qemu_has_ofd_lock()) {
> > + if (!qemu_has_ofd_lock(filename)) {
> > warn_report("File lock requested but OFD locking syscall is "
> > "unavailable, falling back to POSIX file locks");
> > error_printf("Due to the implementation, locks can be lost "
> > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int raw_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict
> > *options,
> > s->use_lock = false;
> > break;
> > case ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO:
> > - s->use_lock = qemu_has_ofd_lock();
> > + s->use_lock = qemu_has_ofd_lock(filename);
> > break;
> > default:
> > abort();
> > @@ -2388,6 +2388,7 @@ raw_co_create(BlockdevCreateOptions *options, Error
> > **errp)
> > int fd;
> > uint64_t perm, shared;
> > int result = 0;
> > + bool use_lock;
> >
> > /* Validate options and set default values */
> > assert(options->driver == BLOCKDEV_DRIVER_FILE);
> > @@ -2428,19 +2429,22 @@ raw_co_create(BlockdevCreateOptions *options, Error
> > **errp)
> > perm = BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_RESIZE;
> > shared = BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_RESIZE;
> >
> > - /* Step one: Take locks */
> > - result = raw_apply_lock_bytes(NULL, fd, perm, ~shared, false, errp);
> > - if (result < 0) {
> > - goto out_close;
> > - }
> > + use_lock = qemu_has_ofd_lock(file_opts->filename);
> > + if (use_lock) {
> > + /* Step one: Take locks */
> > + result = raw_apply_lock_bytes(NULL, fd, perm, ~shared, false,
> > errp);
> > + if (result < 0) {
> > + goto out_close;
> > + }
> >
> > - /* Step two: Check that nobody else has taken conflicting locks */
> > - result = raw_check_lock_bytes(fd, perm, shared, errp);
> > - if (result < 0) {
> > - error_append_hint(errp,
> > - "Is another process using the image [%s]?\n",
> > - file_opts->filename);
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > + /* Step two: Check that nobody else has taken conflicting locks */
> > + result = raw_check_lock_bytes(fd, perm, shared, errp);
> > + if (result < 0) {
> > + error_append_hint(errp,
> > + "Is another process using the image [%s]?\n",
> > + file_opts->filename);
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* Clear the file by truncating it to 0 */
> > diff --git a/include/qemu/osdep.h b/include/qemu/osdep.h
> > index f9ec8c84e9..349adad465 100644
> > --- a/include/qemu/osdep.h
> > +++ b/include/qemu/osdep.h
> > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ int qemu_dup(int fd);
> > int qemu_lock_fd(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t len, bool exclusive);
> > int qemu_unlock_fd(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t len);
> > int qemu_lock_fd_test(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t len, bool exclusive);
> > -bool qemu_has_ofd_lock(void);
> > +bool qemu_has_ofd_lock(const char *filename);
> > #endif
> >
> > #if defined(__HAIKU__) && defined(__i386__)
> > diff --git a/tests/test-image-locking.c b/tests/test-image-locking.c
> > index ba057bd66c..3e80246081 100644
> > --- a/tests/test-image-locking.c
> > +++ b/tests/test-image-locking.c
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >
> > g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
> >
> > - if (qemu_has_ofd_lock()) {
> > + if (qemu_has_ofd_lock(NULL)) {
> > g_test_add_func("/image-locking/basic", test_image_locking_basic);
> > g_test_add_func("/image-locking/set-perm-abort",
> > test_set_perm_abort);
> > }
> > diff --git a/util/osdep.c b/util/osdep.c
> > index 66d01b9160..e7e502edd1 100644
> > --- a/util/osdep.c
> > +++ b/util/osdep.c
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ extern int madvise(char *, size_t, int);
> > static bool fips_enabled = false;
> >
> > static const char *hw_version = QEMU_HW_VERSION;
> > +static const char *null_device = "/dev/null";
> >
> > int socket_set_cork(int fd, int v)
> > {
> > @@ -187,11 +188,10 @@ static int qemu_parse_fdset(const char *param)
> > return qemu_parse_fd(param);
> > }
> >
> > -static void qemu_probe_lock_ops(void)
> > +static void qemu_probe_lock_ops_fd(int fd)
> > {
> > if (fcntl_op_setlk == -1) {
> > #ifdef F_OFD_SETLK
> > - int fd;
> > int ret;
> > struct flock fl = {
> > .l_whence = SEEK_SET,
> > @@ -200,17 +200,7 @@ static void qemu_probe_lock_ops(void)
> > .l_type = F_WRLCK,
> > };
> >
> > - fd = open("/dev/null", O_RDWR);
> > - if (fd < 0) {
> > - fprintf(stderr,
> > - "Failed to open /dev/null for OFD lock probing: %s\n",
> > - strerror(errno));
> > - fcntl_op_setlk = F_SETLK;
> > - fcntl_op_getlk = F_GETLK;
> > - return;
> > - }
> > ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_GETLK, &fl);
> > - close(fd);
> > if (!ret) {
> > fcntl_op_setlk = F_OFD_SETLK;
> > fcntl_op_getlk = F_OFD_GETLK;
> > @@ -225,9 +215,30 @@ static void qemu_probe_lock_ops(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -bool qemu_has_ofd_lock(void)
> > +static void qemu_probe_lock_ops(const char *filename)
> > +{
> > + int fd;
> > + if (filename) {
> > + fd = open(filename, O_RDWR);
> > + } else {
> > + fd = open(null_device, O_RDONLY);
> > + }
> > + if (fd < 0) {
> > + fprintf(stderr,
> > + "Failed to open %s for OFD lock probing: %s\n",
> > + filename ? filename : null_device,
> > + strerror(errno));
> > + fcntl_op_setlk = F_SETLK;
> > + fcntl_op_getlk = F_GETLK;
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + qemu_probe_lock_ops_fd(fd);
> > + close(fd);
> > +}
> > +
>
> This method now does a test whose results will vary based on the
> filename passed in, but it is updating a global variable to say
> whether to use OFD locks. This is looks badly broken when using
> files across different filesystems.
Daniel, thanks for your reply.
I understand your concern, however, this global variable actually maybe
not suitable if files are across different filesystems.
>
> IMHO the raw_co_create method just needs to use a dedicated method
> to check whether fcntl locks are supposed, and all this broken
> refactoring of the OFD check should be removed.
>
OK, I will just keep the fixed part in v2.
> > +bool qemu_has_ofd_lock(const char *filename)
> > {
> > - qemu_probe_lock_ops();
> > + qemu_probe_lock_ops(filename);
> > #ifdef F_OFD_SETLK
> > return fcntl_op_setlk == F_OFD_SETLK;
> > #else
> > @@ -244,7 +255,7 @@ static int qemu_lock_fcntl(int fd, int64_t start,
> > int64_t len, int fl_type)
> > .l_len = len,
> > .l_type = fl_type,
> > };
> > - qemu_probe_lock_ops();
> > + qemu_probe_lock_ops_fd(fd);
> > do {
> > ret = fcntl(fd, fcntl_op_setlk, &fl);
> > } while (ret == -1 && errno == EINTR);
> > @@ -270,7 +281,7 @@ int qemu_lock_fd_test(int fd, int64_t start, int64_t
> > len, bool exclusive)
> > .l_len = len,
> > .l_type = exclusive ? F_WRLCK : F_RDLCK,
> > };
> > - qemu_probe_lock_ops();
> > + qemu_probe_lock_ops_fd(fd);
> > ret = fcntl(fd, fcntl_op_getlk, &fl);
> > if (ret == -1) {
> > return -errno;
> > --
> > 2.24.3
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>
- [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Li Feng, 2020/12/08
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/12/08
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file,
Li Feng <=
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Kevin Wolf, 2020/12/08
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Li Feng, 2020/12/08
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/12/09
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Kevin Wolf, 2020/12/09
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Li Feng, 2020/12/10
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/12/10
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Feng Li, 2020/12/10
- Re: [PATCH] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/12/10
- [PATCH v2] file-posix: detect the lock using the real file, Li Feng, 2020/12/08