Re: [PULL 00/13] 9p queue 2020-10-23

[Christian Schoenebeck]

On Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 15:15:19 CET Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 14:06, Christian Schoenebeck
> 
> <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > Ok, I'll use mkdtemp() instead, that avoids other potential parallel
> > config
> > colissions that I may not have considered yet.
> > 
> > The original motivation against mkdtemp() was that /tmp is isually a
> > ramfs,
> > hence very limited regarding large file tests. But that's not an issue
> > right now.
> 
> How large is "large" here ?
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM

E.g. ~10 GiB which might be a problem for cloud based CI platforms.

But again, we don't have any 9p test doing that yet. So mkdtemp() is just fine 
for now.

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck