qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] tests/acceptance: Test U-Boot/Linux from Armbian 20.


From: Bin Meng
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] tests/acceptance: Test U-Boot/Linux from Armbian 20.08 on Orange Pi PC
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 23:03:07 +0800

Hi Philippe,

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 3:34 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/24/20 3:06 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 1:56 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/23/20 7:42 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> >>> Hi Philippe,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:18 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Series meant to help Bin Meng to debug the SD card issue
> >>>> reported by Michael Roth.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the patches.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4):
> >>>>     Revert "hw/sd: Fix incorrect populated function switch status data
> >>>>       structure"
> >>>>     tests/acceptance: Allow running Orange Pi test using cached artifacts
> >>>>     tests/acceptance: Extract do_test_arm_orangepi_armbian_uboot() method
> >>>>     tests/acceptance: Test U-Boot/Linux from Armbian 20.08 on Orange Pi 
> >>>> PC
> >>>>
> >>>>    hw/sd/sd.c                             |  3 +-
> >>>>    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 68 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>>>    2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> With this series, I used:
> >>>
> >>> $ ARMBIAN_ARTIFACTS_CACHED=1 AVOCADO_ALLOW_LARGE_STORAGE=1 make 
> >>> check-acceptance
> >>>
> >>> It looks that the failure still exists? Log below:
> >>>
> >>> 13-tests_acceptance_boot_linux_console.py_BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_bionic_20_08/debug.log:
> >>>
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| => boot
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| unable to select a mode
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| Device 0: unknown device
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| BOOTP broadcast 1
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| DHCP client bound to address 10.0.2.15 (1 ms)
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| *** Warning: no boot file name; using '0A00020F.img'
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| Using ethernet@1c30000 device
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| TFTP from server 10.0.2.2; our IP address is 10.0.2.15
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| Filename '0A00020F.img'.
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| Load address: 0x42000000
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| Loading: *^H
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| TFTP error: 'Access violation' (2)
> >>> 01:11:27 DEBUG| Not retrying...
> >>
> >> Have you rebuilt qemu-system-arm with the reverted patch included?
> >
> > Oops, I took it for granted that the `make check-acceptance` will
> > automatically rebuild the QEMU binary, which is not the case. Should
> > we enforce the rebuild before testing in Makefiles?
>
> Well I'm not sure, because I don't want to have to rebuild all
> targets before rerunning a single test, but this is a Meson issue
> that could be fixed soon. I'll let Cleber/Paolo decide.
>
> Does that mean I can add your "Tested-by: Bin Meng
> <bin.meng@windriver.com>" to the test patches btw?

Sure.

Regards,
Bin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]