qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs64 when available.


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs64 when available.
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:28:23 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

Hi,

Le 23/10/2020 à 13:29, Franz-Josef Haider a écrit :
> Hi, is there anything preventing this from being merged?

Nothing except your mail format is a little bit weird and your patch is
corrupted...

Anyway, I've fixed these problems and it is now applied to my linux-user
branch. I try to do a pull request soon...

Thanks,
Laurent

> best regards,
> Franz-Josef
> 
> On 30/01/2020 18:52, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 30/01/2020 à 14:00, Frajo a écrit :
>>> linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs64 when available.
>>> Same as d4247ec2d79ef2477cb886fa688706b068119736 but for statfs64
>>> When running rpm within qemu-arm-dynamic this could cause rpm fail with
>>> an error like
>>> "installing package A needs B MB on the C filesystem" depending on what
>>> is in memory in f_flags.
>>> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/af06db1d5558870f7fb8f5c502572c2d27af5c71/lib/transaction.c#L164
>>>
>>>
>>> From 6ceb5662b5fae827d2c0cdd9896eec75997c060a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Franz-Josef Haider <franz.haider@jolla.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:28:24 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] linux-user: Support f_flags in statfs64 when
>>> available.
>>>
>>> Same as d4247ec2d79ef2477cb886fa688706b068119736 but for statfs64
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Franz-Josef Haider <franz.haider@jolla.com>
>>> ---
>>>  linux-user/syscall.c | 5 +++++
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
>>> index d60142f069..45782b1009 100644
>>> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
>>> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
>>> @@ -8997,6 +8997,11 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(void *cpu_env, int
>>> num, abi_long arg1,
>>>              __put_user(stfs.f_fsid.__val[1], &target_stfs->f_fsid.val[1]);
>>>              __put_user(stfs.f_namelen, &target_stfs->f_namelen);
>>>              __put_user(stfs.f_frsize, &target_stfs->f_frsize);
>>> +#ifdef _STATFS_F_FLAGS
>>> +            __put_user(stfs.f_flags, &target_stfs->f_flags);
>>> +#else
>>> +            __put_user(0, &target_stfs->f_flags);
>>> +#endif
>>>              memset(target_stfs->f_spare, 0, sizeof(target_stfs->f_spare));
>>>              unlock_user_struct(target_stfs, arg3, 1);
>>>          }
>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]