qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 25/33] tests/acceptance: Add a test for the N800 and N810 arm


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PULL 25/33] tests/acceptance: Add a test for the N800 and N810 arm machines
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:31:52 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 17/10/2020 19.51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Peter, Igor, Thomas,
> 
> On 2/28/20 5:38 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>
>> Old kernels from the Meego project can be used to check that Linux
>> is at least starting on these machines.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> Message-id: 20200225172501.29609-2-philmd@redhat.com
>> Message-Id: <20200129131920.22302-1-thuth@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   MAINTAINERS                          |  1 +
>>   tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index b66c46dcb9f..264374adbe8 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -686,6 +686,7 @@ F: hw/rtc/twl92230.c
>>   F: include/hw/display/blizzard.h
>>   F: include/hw/input/tsc2xxx.h
>>   F: include/hw/misc/cbus.h
>> +F: tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py
>>     Palm
>>   M: Andrzej Zaborowski <balrogg@gmail.com>
>> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py
>> b/tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..e5741f2d8d1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py
>> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>> +# Functional test that boots a Linux kernel and checks the console
>> +#
>> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Red Hat, Inc.
>> +#
>> +# Author:
>> +#  Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> +#
>> +# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
>> +# later.  See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>> +
>> +import os
>> +
>> +from avocado import skipUnless
>> +from avocado_qemu import Test
>> +from avocado_qemu import wait_for_console_pattern
>> +
>> +class N8x0Machine(Test):
>> +    """Boots the Linux kernel and checks that the console is operational"""
>> +
>> +    timeout = 90
>> +
>> +    def __do_test_n8x0(self):
>> +        kernel_url = ('http://stskeeps.subnetmask.net/meego-n8x0/'
>> +                      'meego-arm-n8x0-1.0.80.20100712.1431-'
>> +                      'vmlinuz-2.6.35~rc4-129.1-n8x0')
>> +        kernel_hash = 'e9d5ab8d7548923a0061b6fbf601465e479ed269'
>> +        kernel_path = self.fetch_asset(kernel_url, asset_hash=kernel_hash)
>> +
>> +        self.vm.set_console(console_index=1)
>> +        self.vm.add_args('-kernel', kernel_path,
>> +                         '-append', 'printk.time=0 console=ttyS1')
>> +        self.vm.launch()
>> +        wait_for_console_pattern(self, 'TSC2005 driver initializing')
>> +
>> +    @skipUnless(os.getenv('AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE'), 'untrusted code')
>> +    def test_n800(self):
>> +        """
>> +        :avocado: tags=arch:arm
>> +        :avocado: tags=machine:n800
>> +        """
>> +        self.__do_test_n8x0()
>> +
>> +    @skipUnless(os.getenv('AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE'), 'untrusted code')
>> +    def test_n810(self):
>> +        """
>> +        :avocado: tags=arch:arm
>> +        :avocado: tags=machine:n810
>> +        """
>> +        self.__do_test_n8x0()
>>
> 
> FYI this test is failing:
> 
> qemu-system-arm: kernel 'meego-arm-n8x0-1.0.80.20100712.1431-vml
> inuz-2.6.35~rc4-129.1-n8x0' is too large to fit in RAM (kernel size 1964608,
> RAM size 0)
> 
> Alex, Thomas, can we enable AVOCADO_ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE on GitLab
> to avoid such regressions?

Yes, please, if you've got some spare minutes to work on such a patch, that
would be great! ... I once already wanted to send such a patch, but IIRC
there were some other ALLOW_UNTRUSTED_CODE tests failing at that poing in
time, and I never got around to fix them...

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]