|
From: | Kirti Wankhede |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v26 05/17] vfio: Add VM state change handler to know state of VM |
Date: | Sun, 18 Oct 2020 02:00:44 +0530 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 |
On 9/26/2020 1:50 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 04:54:07 +0530 Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> wrote:VM state change handler gets called on change in VM's state. This is used to set VFIO device state to _RUNNING. Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <cjia@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> --- hw/vfio/migration.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/vfio/trace-events | 3 +- include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/vfio/migration.c b/hw/vfio/migration.c index 2f760f1f9c47..a30d628ba963 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/migration.c +++ b/hw/vfio/migration.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include "qemu/osdep.h" #include <linux/vfio.h>+#include "sysemu/runstate.h"#include "hw/vfio/vfio-common.h" #include "cpu.h" #include "migration/migration.h" @@ -22,6 +23,58 @@ #include "exec/ram_addr.h" #include "pci.h" #include "trace.h" +#include "hw/hw.h" + +static inline int vfio_mig_access(VFIODevice *vbasedev, void *val, int count, + off_t off, bool iswrite) +{ + int ret; + + ret = iswrite ? pwrite(vbasedev->fd, val, count, off) : + pread(vbasedev->fd, val, count, off); + if (ret < count) { + error_report("vfio_mig_%s%d %s: failed at offset 0x%lx, err: %s", + iswrite ? "write" : "read", count * 8, + vbasedev->name, off, strerror(errno));This would suggest from the log that there's, for example, a vfio_mig_read8 function, which doesn't exist.
Changing to: error_report("vfio_mig_%s %d byte %s: failed at offset 0x%lx, err: %s", iswrite ? "write" : "read", count, vbasedev->name, off, strerror(errno)); Hope this address your concern.
+ return (ret < 0) ? ret : -EINVAL; + } + return 0; +} + +static int vfio_mig_rw(VFIODevice *vbasedev, __u8 *buf, size_t count, + off_t off, bool iswrite) +{ + int ret, done = 0; + __u8 *tbuf = buf; + + while (count) { + int bytes = 0; + + if (count >= 8 && !(off % 8)) { + bytes = 8; + } else if (count >= 4 && !(off % 4)) { + bytes = 4; + } else if (count >= 2 && !(off % 2)) { + bytes = 2; + } else { + bytes = 1; + } + + ret = vfio_mig_access(vbasedev, tbuf, bytes, off, iswrite); + if (ret) { + return ret; + } + + count -= bytes; + done += bytes; + off += bytes; + tbuf += bytes; + } + return done; +} + +#define vfio_mig_read(f, v, c, o) vfio_mig_rw(f, (__u8 *)v, c, o, false) +#define vfio_mig_write(f, v, c, o) vfio_mig_rw(f, (__u8 *)v, c, o, true)static void vfio_migration_region_exit(VFIODevice *vbasedev){ @@ -70,6 +123,82 @@ err: return ret; }+static int vfio_migration_set_state(VFIODevice *vbasedev, uint32_t mask,+ uint32_t value) +{ + VFIOMigration *migration = vbasedev->migration; + VFIORegion *region = &migration->region; + off_t dev_state_off = region->fd_offset + + offsetof(struct vfio_device_migration_info, device_state); + uint32_t device_state; + int ret; + + ret = vfio_mig_read(vbasedev, &device_state, sizeof(device_state), + dev_state_off); + if (ret < 0) { + return ret; + } + + device_state = (device_state & mask) | value;Agree with Connie that mask and value args are not immediately obvious how they're used. I don't have a naming convention that would be more clear and the names do make some sense once they're understood, but a comment to indicate mask bits are preserved, value bits are set, remaining bits are cleared would probably help the reader.
Added comment.
+ + if (!VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_VALID(device_state)) { + return -EINVAL; + } + + ret = vfio_mig_write(vbasedev, &device_state, sizeof(device_state), + dev_state_off); + if (ret < 0) { + ret = vfio_mig_read(vbasedev, &device_state, sizeof(device_state), + dev_state_off); + if (ret < 0) { + return ret;Seems like we're in pretty bad shape here, should this be combined with below to trigger a hw_error?
Ok.
+ } + + if (VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_IS_ERROR(device_state)) { + hw_error("%s: Device is in error state 0x%x", + vbasedev->name, device_state); + return -EFAULT; + } + } + + vbasedev->device_state = device_state; + trace_vfio_migration_set_state(vbasedev->name, device_state); + return 0;So we return success even if we failed to write the desired state as long as we were able to read back any non-error state? vbasedev->device_state remains correct, but it seems confusing form a caller perspective that a set-state can succeed but it's then necessary to check the state.
Correcting here. If vfio_mig_write() had retured error, return error from vfio_migration_set_state()
+} + +static void vfio_vmstate_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState state) +{ + VFIODevice *vbasedev = opaque; + + if ((vbasedev->vm_running != running)) { + int ret; + uint32_t value = 0, mask = 0; + + if (running) { + value = VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING; + if (vbasedev->device_state & VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING) { + mask = ~VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING; + } + } else { + mask = ~VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING; + } + + ret = vfio_migration_set_state(vbasedev, mask, value); + if (ret) { + /* + * vm_state_notify() doesn't support reporting failure. If such + * error reporting support added in furure, migration should be + * aborted. + */ + error_report("%s: Failed to set device state 0x%x", + vbasedev->name, value & mask); + }Here for instance we assume that success means the device is now in the desired state, but we'd actually need to evaluate vbasedev->device_state to determine that.
Updating.
+ vbasedev->vm_running = running; + trace_vfio_vmstate_change(vbasedev->name, running, RunState_str(state), + value & mask); + } +} + static int vfio_migration_init(VFIODevice *vbasedev, struct vfio_region_info *info) { @@ -87,8 +216,11 @@ static int vfio_migration_init(VFIODevice *vbasedev, vbasedev->name); g_free(vbasedev->migration); vbasedev->migration = NULL; + return ret; }+ vbasedev->vm_state = qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(vfio_vmstate_change,+ vbasedev); return ret; }@@ -131,6 +263,10 @@ add_blocker: void vfio_migration_finalize(VFIODevice *vbasedev){ + if (vbasedev->vm_state) { + qemu_del_vm_change_state_handler(vbasedev->vm_state); + } + if (vbasedev->migration_blocker) { migrate_del_blocker(vbasedev->migration_blocker); error_free(vbasedev->migration_blocker); diff --git a/hw/vfio/trace-events b/hw/vfio/trace-events index 8fe913175d85..6524734bf7b4 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/trace-events +++ b/hw/vfio/trace-events @@ -149,4 +149,5 @@ vfio_display_edid_write_error(void) ""# migration.cvfio_migration_probe(const char *name, uint32_t index) " (%s) Region %d" - +vfio_migration_set_state(char *name, uint32_t state) " (%s) state %d" +vfio_vmstate_change(char *name, int running, const char *reason, uint32_t dev_state) " (%s) running %d reason %s device state %d" diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h index 8275c4c68f45..25e3b1a3b90a 100644 --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX #include <linux/vfio.h> #endif +#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"#define VFIO_MSG_PREFIX "vfio %s: " @@ -119,6 +120,9 @@ typedef struct VFIODevice {unsigned int flags; VFIOMigration *migration; Error *migration_blocker; + VMChangeStateEntry *vm_state; + uint32_t device_state; + int vm_running;Could these be placed in VFIOMigration? Thanks,
I think device_state should be part of VFIODevice since its about device rather than only related to migration, others can be moved to VFIOMigration.
Thanks, Kirti
Alex} VFIODevice;struct VFIODeviceOps {
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |