qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] accel/tcg: Add CPU_LOG_EXEC tracing for cpu_io_recompile()


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/tcg: Add CPU_LOG_EXEC tracing for cpu_io_recompile()
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 16:18:24 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

On 10/13/20 5:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> When using -icount, it's useful for the CPU_LOG_EXEC logging
> to include information about when cpu_io_recompile() was
> called, because it alerts the reader of the log that the
> tracing of a previous TB execution may not actually
> correspond to an actually executed instruction. For instance
> if you're using -icount and also -singlestep then a guest
> instruction that makes an IO access appears in two
> "Trace" lines, once in a TB that triggers the cpu_io_recompile()
> and then again in the TB that actually executes.
> 
> (This is a similar reason to why the "Stopped execution of
> TB chain before..." logging in cpu_tb_exec() is helpful
> when trying to track execution flow in the logs.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Thanks, queued to tcg-next.


r~

> ---
>  accel/tcg/translate-all.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/tcg/translate-all.c b/accel/tcg/translate-all.c
> index d76097296df..4572b4901fb 100644
> --- a/accel/tcg/translate-all.c
> +++ b/accel/tcg/translate-all.c
> @@ -2267,6 +2267,10 @@ void cpu_io_recompile(CPUState *cpu, uintptr_t retaddr)
>          tb_destroy(tb);
>      }
>  
> +    qemu_log_mask_and_addr(CPU_LOG_EXEC, tb->pc,
> +                           "cpu_io_recompile: rewound execution of TB to "
> +                           TARGET_FMT_lx "\n", tb->pc);
> +
>      /* TODO: If env->pc != tb->pc (i.e. the faulting instruction was not
>       * the first in the TB) then we end up generating a whole new TB and
>       *  repeating the fault, which is horribly inefficient.
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]