[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] 9pfs: add new function v9fs_co_readdir_many()
From: |
Christian Schoenebeck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] 9pfs: add new function v9fs_co_readdir_many() |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:34:12 +0200 |
On Dienstag, 28. Juli 2020 10:46:00 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > So I'll prepare a v8 with this patch here split into two.
> >
> > But this is it. I don't see another chunk in this patch set that could be
> > split further down in an useful way.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Christian Schoenebeck
>
> You're in charge now so feel free to do that if the development+testing
> cost is acceptable to you.
Yep, that's the plan. This patch set is already thoroughly tested by me, so I
would like to avoid major changes for this series now that would require me to
restart major testing cycles.
In this particular case, this patch-split ends up in 100% identical code. So
it is really just git history tweaking after all.
> You already know my take on having smaller
> patches :)
A pure desire for something is one thing, the actually available real-life
options are another thing. If you see more options than I can identify, you
are always invited to make your call.
Plus this patch series already contain trivial patches for a long time (e.g.
patch 1, 2, 6), and yet I haven't seen any ack from your side for any of them.
Be invited for that as well.
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
[PATCH v7 1/6] tests/virtio-9p: added split readdir tests, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/19
[PATCH v7 6/6] 9pfs: clarify latency of v9fs_co_run_in_worker(), Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/19
[PATCH v7 4/6] 9pfs: T_readdir latency optimization, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/19
[PATCH v7 5/6] 9pfs: differentiate readdir lock between 9P2000.u vs. 9P2000.L, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/19
[PATCH v7 2/6] 9pfs: make v9fs_readdir_response_size() public, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/07/19