|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v3 13/16] linux-user,ppc: fix clock_nanosleep() for linux-user-ppc |
Date: | Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:24:43 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 7/23/20 11:45 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> > > Our safe_clock_nanosleep() returns -1 and updates errno. > > We don't need to update the CRF bit in syscall.c because it will > be updated in ppc/cpu_loop.c as the return value is negative. > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> > Message-Id: <20200722174612.2917566-3-laurent@vivier.eu> > --- > linux-user/syscall.c | 7 ------- > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |