qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH] buildsys: Only build capstone if softmmu/user mode is en


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] buildsys: Only build capstone if softmmu/user mode is enabled
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:46:23 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 7/24/20 11:38 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/24/20 9:56 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 24/07/2020 09.16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> At least one of softmmu or user mode has to be enabled to use
>>> capstone. If not, don't clone/built it.
>>>
>>> This save CI time for the tools/documentation-only build jobs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>>> ---
>>>  configure | 4 ++++
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
>>> index 4bd80ed507..bc5757159a 100755
>>> --- a/configure
>>> +++ b/configure
>>> @@ -5381,6 +5381,10 @@ fi
>>>  ##########################################
>>>  # capstone
>>>  
>>> +if test -z "$capstone" && test $tcg = 'no' ; then # !tcg implies !softmmu
>>> +  capstone="no"
>>> +fi
>>
>> I don't think this is right. You could have a KVM-only build where you
>> still want to use the disassembler for the human monitor.
> 
> I had the same question with KVM, I agree this is unclear, this is why
> I added RFC.
> 
> Don't we have !softmmu implies !kvm?

It works because it falls back to the old disas.c (if capstone is
here, use it, else fall-back).

Does this means we can directly remove the capstone experiment &
submodule without waiting for the libllvm integration?

> 
>>
>> But maybe it could be disabled if softmmu="no", linux_user="no" and
>> bsd_user="no" ?
>>
>>  Thomas
>>
>>
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]