[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iotests.py: Add wait_for_runstate()
From: |
Max Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iotests.py: Add wait_for_runstate() |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:05:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 20.07.20 18:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 16.07.2020 16:53, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
>> b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
>> index 3590ed78a0..fb240a334c 100644
>> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
>> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
>> @@ -803,6 +803,10 @@ class VM(qtest.QEMUQtestMachine):
>> 'Found node %s under %s (but expected %s)' % \
>> (node['name'], path, expected_node)
>> + def wait_for_runstate(self, runstate: str) -> None:
>> + while self.qmp('query-status')['return']['status'] != runstate:
>> + pass
>
> don't we need something like time.sleep(0.5) instead of just pass?
Hm. Maybe not “need”? I thought this polling would last a short time
anyway, so it wouldn’t matter if there was high CPU usage during that time.
OTOH, I don’t think a short sleep would hurt.
> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>
>> +
>> index_re = re.compile(r'([^\[]+)\[([^\]]+)\]')
>> class QMPTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
>>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature