[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 10/13] tests/plugins: add -Wno-unknown-warning-option to h
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 10/13] tests/plugins: add -Wno-unknown-warning-option to handle -Wpsabi |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:27:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 |
On 13/07/2020 18.39, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> On 7/9/20 7:13 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> Not all compilers support the -Wpsabi (clang-9 in my case).
>>>
>>> Fixes: bac8d222a
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> tests/plugin/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/plugin/Makefile b/tests/plugin/Makefile
>>> index 0cb8e35ae407..dcfbd99b15b8 100644
>>> --- a/tests/plugin/Makefile
>>> +++ b/tests/plugin/Makefile
>>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ NAMES += hwprofile
>>>
>>> SONAMES := $(addsuffix .so,$(addprefix lib,$(NAMES)))
>>>
>>> -QEMU_CFLAGS += -fPIC -Wpsabi
>>> +QEMU_CFLAGS += -fPIC -Wno-unknown-warning-option -Wpsabi
>>
>> Surely -Wno-unknown-warning-option is in the same boat? E.g. I don't see any
>> version of gcc that supports it.
>
> GCC doesn't seem to complain about it though.
Both, GCC and Clang do not complain about unknown -Wno-somthing options
as long as there are no other warnings. They only complain for options
that do not have a "no-" after the "-W".
Thomas
- Re: [PATCH v1 08/13] plugins: expand the bb plugin to be thread safe and track per-cpu, (continued)
[PATCH v1 11/13] tests/docker: fall back more gracefully when pull fails, Alex Bennée, 2020/07/09
[PATCH v1 12/13] tests/docker: update toolchain set in debian-xtensa-cross, Alex Bennée, 2020/07/09
[PATCH v1 07/13] plugins: new hwprofile plugin, Alex Bennée, 2020/07/09
[PATCH v1 13/13] configure: remove all dependencies on a (re)configure, Alex Bennée, 2020/07/09