qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] Remove the CONFIG_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTIC_AVAILABLE switch


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Remove the CONFIG_PRAGMA_DIAGNOSTIC_AVAILABLE switch
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:08:52 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 10/07/2020 15.25, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 05:56, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> GCC supports "#pragma GCC diagnostic" since version 4.6, and
>> Clang seems to support it, too, since its early versions 3.x.
>> That means that our minimum required compiler versions all support
>> this pragma already and we can remove the test from configure and
>> all the related #ifdefs in the code.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  v2: Keep the !defined(__clang__) in coroutine-ucontext.c
> 
> If we're going to mandate "at least gcc 4.6 or clang", perhaps
> we should have a sanity check for it, something like
> 
> #if !defined __clang__
> # if !QEMU_GNUC_PREREQ(4, 6)
> #  error QEMU requires at least GCC 4.6
> # endif
> #endif
> 
> (maybe also check clang version, though that is more awkward
> because upstream clang and Apple's compiler set the version
> number defines differently.)
> 
> We could put that in compiler.h. Checking in configure would be
> more userfriendly but maybe a little more effort.
> The other advantage of this check is we have effectively
> some internal documentation of our current minimum
> compiler requirement.

It's already there. Look for:

 "You need at least GCC v4.8 or Clang v3.4 (or XCode Clang v5.1)"

in the configure script.

> There is also some tidying up that can then be done:
> several places in the code use QEMU_GNU_PREREQ() to insist
> on "at least gcc 4.4" or "at least gcc 4.6",
Oh, weird, I thought we got rid of all of them when we bumped the
minimum requirement to GCC 4.8 ... these spots could certainly be
cleaned up nowadays.

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]