[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: Is VXHS actually maintained? |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 17:25:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.5.4; emacs 28.0.50 |
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 16:50, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>> That looks more like it got missed in a clean-up series because we don't
>> have coverage in our typical builds and CI?
>
> Yes, very likely. But there's no point in fixing and then adding CI
> for a config that our users have demonstrated that they do not use;
> better to just remove it.
Fair enough. It can always be restored from the history if someone
cares.
--
Alex Bennée
- Is VXHS actually maintained?, Marc-André Lureau, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Thomas Huth, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Peter Maydell, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Marc-André Lureau, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Peter Maydell, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Alex Bennée, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Peter Maydell, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?, Marc-André Lureau, 2020/07/09
- Re: Is VXHS actually maintained?,
Alex Bennée <=