Re: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Cover the firmware JSON schema

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 7/3/20 7:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 06:58:45PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 07/03/20 18:18, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 06:14:53PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Add an entry to cover firmware.json (see commit 3a0adfc9bf:
>>>> schema that describes the different uses and properties of
>>>> virtual machine firmware).
>>>> Cc the libvirt maintainers if it ever changes.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>>> Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Based on a comment from Laszlo:
>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg604925.html
>>>>
>>>> I don't think Laszlo should be the sole maintainer, not sure
>>>> who else should be listed. Gerd and Kashyap? :)
>>>> Can we add it 'maintained' without specific maintainer?
>>>> ---
>>>>  MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> index dec252f38b..57c90201df 100644
>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> @@ -2601,6 +2601,12 @@ F: include/hw/i2c/smbus_master.h
>>>>  F: include/hw/i2c/smbus_slave.h
>>>>  F: include/hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.h
>>>>  
>>>> +Firmware schema specifications
>>>> +M: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>>> +R: libvir-list@redhat.com
>>>
>>> FWIW, I don't think libvirt needs to review this. Our firmware handling
>>> code doesn't really care what specific files exist - it just follows the
>>> declared logic to pick amongst whatever exists.
>>
>> I request that
>>
>> - Phil be listed please as another maintainer (so there are two people
>> that can send pull requests, if a 3rd person needs to patch this file
>> for whatever reason),
>>
>> - Dan be listed please *at least* as an "R" person; the business logic
>> written up under the @Firmware element, and lots of the initial review
>> comments (in particular the suggestion to mention specific QEMU command
>> line switches in the schema), had come from him.
>>
>> If Dan is willing to be an "M", then we can collapse both of my above
>> requests into one, and Phil wouldn't have to be listed (Dan could both
>> review suggested changes and submit pull requests). However, I'm raising
>> this only as a technical possibility; what really matters to me is that
>> Dan be CC'd on suggested changes, and that someone other than me can
>> submit PRs if necessary.
> 
> I'm fine with "R", but don't want to be "M" as I don't want to be
> responsible for queueing patches, etc on more parts of QEMU.

Thanks all! I'm queuing this patch as:

Firmware schema specifications
M: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
M: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
R: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
R: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
S: Maintained
F: docs/interop/firmware.json

Regards,

Phil.